[kitten] Document Shepherd Write-Up for draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis

Matt Rogers <mrogers@redhat.com> Tue, 11 April 2017 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <mrogers@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1570712EAB4 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.421
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.421 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXI44KqhRXGi for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-f170.google.com (mail-qt0-f170.google.com [209.85.216.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BF3312EAB8 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-f170.google.com with SMTP id n46so58270820qta.2 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=e7eJ02idGih2kxc5pZloiURkAYbkrL06z/4his4gDL8=; b=AvDkVTsXsppy+ql2DRtAt+u3r2Ywr6I1IMvLnQBgOX/f7kxcqeIyQEf5J99Rl+jbwc zB/6JqZM454fXB2UQ8xAzBLRiVh97o0U2w2l/XOYqmdXwdnGUASWTZEvmfQTzOcMzPke znExJsXMwsNVpyylt5SITBPIDnlb96z8im4nxnCod7cTuSqJiAb2aPRdMFyeLYIk7IXU Pv0xgU+h86A25xp26PkBZm1aFzuw4qigIYhjUQWrOx7OxkAJ4mVUuSQ6DaT3NcDUb2kX izZ9tvQSowidiJF8fv9CXmltjbzYGXaKnGHnfygZl/djy1dyG/5gC6zuUit7wW4BdYPf pkZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/74j6BSw0zabkTAZsbTQHRdfTg9wrbKC94yWcea+rtwbG9aqLq2TpAFG9fr1JOzGPLKmvirX6DWoE6ulmMF
X-Received: by 10.237.37.24 with SMTP id v24mr6299634qtc.290.1491923105280; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:05:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.175.145 with HTTP; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 08:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt Rogers <mrogers@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:04:34 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAeFVfz8XqKn6YLzV_=khrxniPsGAR+=7AzEwLv2dHQEwR5guw@mail.gmail.com>
To: iesg-secretary@ietf.org, ekr@rtfm.com, kitten@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/0RPCmxZAbq_pqSokqD06LsCCNt0>
Subject: [kitten] Document Shepherd Write-Up for draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 15:05:22 -0000

Summary:
Matt Rogers is the Document Shepherd. Eric Rescorla is the Responsible
Area Director.

This document is a Proposed Standard to update RFC 5653  (Generic
Security Service API Version 2 : Java Bindings Update). This document
addresses a flaw in RFC 5653 by extending the GSSException class with
an error token, as well as removing the specification of stream-based
GSSContext methods.

Review and Consensus:
There is consensus among the WG for this document, and it saw active
discussion and review by WG members. As a ‘bis’ document, all errata
have been considered. Concerns about the design of the stream-based
GSSContext methods were brought up and addressed during the WG Last
Call process and there was agreement on their removal from the
document.

Intellectual Property:
There are no intellectual property disclosures against this document,
and all authors have confirmed compliance with BCPs 78 and 79.

Note:
The idnits check mentions an obsoleted normative reference to RFC
2853, which is the predecessor to RFC 5653. The references are used
only during explanation of the differences since RFC 2853.