Re: [kitten] WGLC on draft-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2-08

Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@secure-endpoints.com> Sun, 17 April 2016 00:25 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=19156ebd1f=jaltman@secure-endpoints.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C43812DB39 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 17:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.79
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=secure-endpoints.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WPjd-d_KBnis for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 17:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia-grove.secure-endpoints.com (sequoia-grove.ad.secure-endpoints.com [208.125.0.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA0C612DB14 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 17:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=secure-endpoints.com; s=MDaemon; t=1460852688; x=1461457488; i=jaltman@secure-endpoints.com; q=dns/txt; h=VBR-Info:Subject:To: References:From:Openpgp:Organization:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type; bh=YCUqEmDnM7upXXRSLcb6z1 kEcBKkIQAYws560Wuzhxk=; b=BsDQ7BkOqsKYkwzEQgc8jU64mDvpP3A+yuzsB3 5vcudUPTjnm7nbdW/UiiC2/hgHPrWFeFUw/WBvc2hIj+Iv/prkMFLLu0OC3FVXPN HZeeepwxosgYBGREXzbczN57N+EU+a2RTbW18ueuWRFAWrmea/CgvQOH/8E9GUv0 isTso=
X-MDAV-Result: clean
X-MDAV-Processed: sequoia-grove.secure-endpoints.com, Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:24:48 -0400
X-Spam-Processed: sequoia-grove.secure-endpoints.com, Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:24:47 -0400
Received: from [x.x.x.x] by secure-endpoints.com (Cipher TLSv1:AES-SHA:256) (MDaemon PRO v16.0.1) with ESMTPSA id md50001073739.msg for <kitten@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:24:46 -0400
VBR-Info: md=secure-endpoints.com; mc=all; mv=vbr.emailcertification.org;
X-MDRemoteIP: 68.53.147.107
X-MDArrival-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 20:24:46 -0400
X-Authenticated-Sender: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
X-Return-Path: prvs=19156ebd1f=jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
X-Envelope-From: jaltman@secure-endpoints.com
X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: kitten@ietf.org
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>, kitten@ietf.org
References: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1601060014510.26829@multics.mit.edu> <alpine.GSO.1.10.1601252228170.26829@multics.mit.edu>
From: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@secure-endpoints.com>
Openpgp: id=FA444AF197F449B24CF3E699F77A735592B69A04; url=http://pgp.mit.edu
Organization: Secure Endpoints Inc.
Message-ID: <5712D7A8.30008@secure-endpoints.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 19:24:08 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1601252228170.26829@multics.mit.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms090108090001010001000702"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/2EiqJswWd-6K98dE3ICk9pBCTZg>
Subject: Re: [kitten] WGLC on draft-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2-08
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 00:25:12 -0000

On 1/25/2016 9:32 PM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> Thanks to everyone who reviewed the document for this WGLC.  There were no
> major issues raised, so the document will be able to be sent to the IESG
> once a new version is produced that fixes the minor issues that were
> raised.
> 
> -Ben

Ben,

Where do we stand on this document?

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2/
reports the state as being:

  In WG Last Call
  Revised I-D Needed - Issue raised by WGLC

but the revised I-D -09 was published on 26 January 2016.  Greg
confirmed that same day that all of the issues he raised had been addressed.

Heimdal has full implementation ready to be shipped as soon as the IANA
registry assignments are made.

Thank you.

Jeffrey Altman