Re: [kitten] taking on new work?

Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> Thu, 06 April 2017 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <rharwood@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162141294E8 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:56:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sJAJK4oRuPwP for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1745C124BFA for <kitten@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 05:56:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B9268E3DA; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 9B9268E3DA
Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com
Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rharwood@redhat.com
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 9B9268E3DA
Received: from localhost (ovpn-64-2.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.64.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C00598BF6; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 12:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: kitten@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20170405191034.GF4004@localhost>
References: <20170405045550.GJ30306@kduck.kaduk.org> <20170405191034.GF4004@localhost>
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 08:56:42 -0400
Message-ID: <jlglgrdbsol.fsf@thriss.redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Thu, 06 Apr 2017 12:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/FWVeKUQWLwc5fOKKSpXxoFEr8Gg>
Subject: Re: [kitten] taking on new work?
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2017 12:56:49 -0000

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> writes:

> On Tue, Apr 04, 2017 at 11:55:50PM -0500, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>
>> What do people currently feel are the top one or two highest
>> priority items for the WG to consider?
>
>  - SPAKE

Biased of course, but this is my highest.

>  - Channel bound flag...

This is my second.

>  - TLS-1.3-based GSS mechanism

Also consider this one important.