Re: [kitten] GSS-API and timeouts

Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> Wed, 04 April 2012 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <simon@josefsson.org>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F2121F87EB for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.742
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.742 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_EQ_STATICB=1.372, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r+xx8qLEbiHb for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:16:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from yxa-v.extundo.com (static-213-115-179-173.sme.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.115.179.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BFB21F87E8 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Apr 2012 10:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from latte.josefsson.org (static-213-115-179-130.sme.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.115.179.130]) (authenticated bits=0) by yxa-v.extundo.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id q34HFtkJ002776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 4 Apr 2012 19:15:56 +0200
From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
To: William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com>
References: <87obr7lfqc.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> <1333554083.71760.YahooMailNeo__8959.87156914107$1333554099$gmane$org@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
OpenPGP: id=B565716F; url=http://josefsson.org/key.txt
X-Hashcash: 1:22:120404:wmills@yahoo-inc.com::IBedanPU6gEvqkIz:BmMs
X-Hashcash: 1:22:120404:kitten@ietf.org::vFl76FlzTXTCRauX:XfHs
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 19:15:54 +0200
In-Reply-To: <1333554083.71760.YahooMailNeo__8959.87156914107$1333554099$gmane$org@web31804.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (William Mills's message of "Wed, 4 Apr 2012 08:41:23 -0700 (PDT)")
Message-ID: <87limbju45.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.130004 (Ma Gnus v0.4) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at yxa-v
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: "kitten@ietf.org" <kitten@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [kitten] GSS-API and timeouts
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/kitten>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 17:16:06 -0000

William Mills <wmills@yahoo-inc.com> writes:

> As a result of the OpenID flow/redirect don't you get a complete
> credential that can be used to finish the process?  Can't you connect
> again, get a challenge perhaps, submit that completed credential and
> be done?  That's very similar to what I did in the OAUTH/SASL thing,
> so I'm replaying my one trick :)

The problem is that the browser interaction in OPENID20/SAML20 can take
a long time because it is interactive, and the server doesn't know when
to stop waiting.

/Simon

>
>
>
>
>
>
>>________________________________
>> From: Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org>
>>To: kitten@ietf.org 
>>Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 7:43 AM
>>Subject: [kitten] GSS-API and timeouts
>> 
>>When implementing the GSS-API part of OPENID20/SAML20 I noticed that the
>>processes can hang waiting for a long time.  Server may want to wait one
>>minute or more to allow a user to finish the IdP authentication.
>>
>>I think Nico discussed asynchronous GSS-API before.  However it is a
>>significant amount of work to specify and implement.  I think it is
>>simpler for applications to create a separate process or thread for the
>>GSS-API part, and to enforce its own timeouts.  Sometimes there are
>>other reasons for having separate processes/threads anyway.
>>
>>Still, even an asynchronous interface may want to use some timeouts
>>where authentication is no longer expected to ever finish.  So it is not
>>clear that an asynchronous interface is the solution to this problem.
>>
>>Does anyone have any thoughts on what a reasonable timeout should be?
>>
>>Or should GSS-API initiators and acceptors never timeout, but just hang
>>indefinitely in case the authentication eventually completes?
>>
>>Of course, we could have a new GSS-API interface to enforce a timeout.
>>For example:
>>
>>     OM_uint32
>>     gss_sec_context_timeout (OM_uint32 *minor_status,
>>                              OM_uint32 timeout);
>>
>>or something more general, in case there are similar concerns for other
>>functions:
>>
>>
>>     OM_uint32
>>     gss_set_timeouts (OM_uint32 *minor_status,
>>                       OM_uint32 sec_context_timeout,
>>                       OM_uint32 micwrap_timeout);
>>
>>FWIW, in my implementation I'll probably use a 5 minute timeout or
>>something like that.
>>
>>/Simon
>>_______________________________________________
>>Kitten mailing list
>>Kitten@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Kitten mailing list
> Kitten@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten