IETF Logo Mail Archive

[kitten] call for reviews of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator

Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU> Tue, 09 August 2016 15:47 UTC

Return-Path: <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B63812B04F for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 08:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.247, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2OBl9CJwDQkJ for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 08:47:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-6.mit.edu [18.7.68.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1298212D13A for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 08:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 12074423-793ff700000019a7-0f-57a9faf6a8dc
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id AF.3B.06567.6FAF9A75; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:47:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u79Fl1Jn023948 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:47:02 -0400
Received: from multics.mit.edu (system-low-sipb.mit.edu [18.187.2.37]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u79FkwjH007745 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:47:01 -0400
Received: (from kaduk@localhost) by multics.mit.edu (8.12.9.20060308) id u79Fkw9L018340; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 11:46:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 11:46:58 -0400
From: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@MIT.EDU>
To: kitten@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.GSO.1.10.1608091142540.5272@multics.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (GSO 962 2008-03-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrHIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrfvt18pwg49n9CyObl7F4sDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujLX/NjMXXGauWPFhJUsD4wemLkZODgkBE4nnJ28xdzFycQgJ tDFJrLs6nw3COcYo8WbtZCjnOpPE64f7mEFahATqJX70nmMHsVkEtCTeNG9iBLHZBFQkZr7Z yAZiiwgIS+ze+g6sXljAUWLy/i1A6zg4eAUcJCZ1coCERQV0JFbvn8ICYvMKCEqcnPkEzGYG Grl8+jaWCYy8s5CkZiFJLWBkWsUom5JbpZubmJlTnJqsW5ycmJeXWqRrppebWaKXmlK6iREU NOwuyjsYX/Z5H2IU4GBU4uG9sHxFuBBrYllxZe4hRkkOJiVR3n8HVoYL8SXlp1RmJBZnxBeV 5qQWH2KU4GBWEuG9+h0ox5uSWFmVWpQPk5LmYFES593+rT1cSCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIJivDwaEk wbvtJ1CjYFFqempFWmZOCUKaiYMTZDgP0PALIDW8xQWJucWZ6RD5U4y6HAt+3F7LJMSSl5+X KiXO+wOkSACkKKM0D24OONp3M6m+YhQHekuYlwcY+0I8wEQBN+kV0BImoCVJqitAlpQkIqSk Ghg7D6+rnlNSWxPeosSwd2rkc0dHB/E2YbOzfmb/dsnkGay40Fk+b8flu58qXs6t2algNHfj ucWFTxPWzP+avcrL0J0j4YXV/LtXvSwUf/NFpaT8qY6b8+Jq/MvMLkGFlVcXxcts9Ktu/17Z rFm26Acj1+bvf574Vf8vWFnKLe550ETuTvHld5+UWIozEg21mIuKEwHABXan0QIAAA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/SYwm_FVaInzYcuVpt4u7YJstsgg>
Subject: [kitten] call for reviews of draft-ietf-kitten-krb-auth-indicator
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 15:47:06 -0000

This document is being implemented and is likely ready to advance to the
IESG, but as Nathaniel noted at the end of June, it's only had Greg's
review of the -02, my review of the precursor draft, and whatever review
Tom did when the authdata number was assigned.  It would be good to get a
couple more reviews before we send this document over to the IESG, even if
we are going to try out the new scheme that skips a formal WGLC.

-Ben
for the kitten chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email