Re: [kitten] WGLC for three "bis" documents: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc4402bis-00, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-01, draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-00

[Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:

> This message begins the Working Group Last Call (WGLC) for the following
> three documents: "A Pseudo-Random Function (PRF) for the Kerberos V
> Generic Security Service Application Program Interface (GSS-API)
> Mechanism" <draft-ietf-kitten-rfc4402bis-00>, "Generic Security Service
> API Version 2: Java Bindings Update" <draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-01>,
> and "Anonymity Support for Kerberos" <draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-00>.
> Because there are three documents under review, and the whole body of the
> documents are up for re-review (not just the updates), the WGLC is
> extended to four weeks, so the WGLC will end on Tuesday February 17th,
> 2015.  The drafts are available at:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc4402bis-00
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-01
(an -02 witih editorial fixes was issued during the WGLC)
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-00

Now that the WGLC period is over, I've gone through the on-list discussion
to determine the outcome of the WGLC.

Shawn has made some editorial fixes to rfc4402bis already; there are a few
more, but then I think we can put out an -01 and progress it forward.

There seems to be general agreement on the GSSException additions in
rfc5653bis, but further discussion is needed on the preexisting issue
raised about the stream-based methods.  It seems likely that the resulting
document update will be substantial enough to require another WGLC.

rfc6112bis received the fewest comments, which were mostly editorial but a
couple minor substantive issues were raised.  A new version should be
issued incorporating the suggested changes.  The minor substantive issues
may be minor enough that another WGLC is not needed, but it is not
entirely clear since the new text is not finalized yet.  Sam, you
submitted the -00 -- will you be able to submit the update as well?

Thanks,

Ben