Re: [kitten] I-D Action: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-03.txt

Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu> Wed, 06 April 2016 14:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ghudson@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EF412D563 for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 07:50:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pKwT5hIEUVek for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 07:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-4.mit.edu [18.9.25.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0DB312D56D for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 07:50:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: 1209190f-c8fff70000004b9e-c7-5705221e9b0b
Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 4D.DD.19358.E1225075; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id u36Eo6Y4010525 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:50:06 -0400
Received: from [18.101.8.140] (vpn-18-101-8-140.mit.edu [18.101.8.140]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as ghudson@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id u36Eo47R011249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <kitten@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:50:06 -0400
References: <20160406135854.24895.86806.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: kitten@ietf.org
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <5705221C.2020101@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:50:04 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160406135854.24895.86806.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrPIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrSunxBpu8Py+icXRzatYHBg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVsfDOPtaCzywVq47eZWlg/M7cxcjJISFgIjFx7UYgm4tDSKCN SeJX40NGCOcYo8ScT60sEM5NJol9/z6zgrQIC7hKPNo4mwXEFhJwlNj6aD/YKBEBYYndW9+B 2WwCyhLr929lgVghJ9HbPQnM5hVQk5h//zojiM0ioCLxZ+ImsHpRgQiJJ3NPMkLUCEqcnPkE rJ5TwEniTs9FJhCbWUBPYsf1X6wQtrxE89bZzBMYBWYhaZmFpGwWkrIFjMyrGGVTcqt0cxMz c4pTk3WLkxPz8lKLdE30cjNL9FJTSjcxgsNSkn8H45wG70OMAhyMSjy8AlYs4UKsiWXFlbmH GCU5mJREeT0lWMOF+JLyUyozEosz4otKc1KLDzFKcDArifAyKgDleFMSK6tSi/JhUtIcLEri vIwMDAxCAumJJanZqakFqUUwWRkODiUJ3ucgjYJFqempFWmZOSUIaSYOTpDhPEDDH4INLy5I zC3OTIfIn2LU5Vjw4/ZaJiGWvPy8VClx3nkgRQIgRRmleXBzwOkklaPnFaM40FvCvEtBqniA qQhu0iugJUxAS+qFmUCWlCQipKQaGB042Q6f8LB64Npp2FH+fvv9rVf/MaiKNtYs7t3Uccvi kIvF8cykO+ePPm9o3LNJ/COD/KT2rovLtx3SSPY4a32aWZ2jzaJtuSpvL3u71bXTan77rdy8 pvdUBF5dulg8eRpj29uknlX3ps6ctp2Hvb2QS/3+q+tRjQscTgR++u3DsWIfz9/jXkosxRmJ hlrMRcWJACGH0EwCAwAA
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/dmeY3EN90Rutl0UlPt88Q80noy0>
Subject: Re: [kitten] I-D Action: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-03.txt
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:50:10 -0000

I have looked at the diff, and I think removing the stream methods is a
reasonable path forward given the problems they present.

I have two editorial nits:

* In section 1, "This document and its predecessor" should be "This
document and its predecessors" given the subsequent change.

* In section 11, "This document has following changes" should be "This
document has the following changes".

Aside from those minor issues, everything looks okay.  I only looked at
the diffs, so if there is material about the stream methods in RFC 5653
which should be removed or edited but wasn't, I wouldn't have noticed.