IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [kitten] I-D: Best practices for password hashing and storage

Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com> Tue, 12 May 2020 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rharwood@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: kitten@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F473A09CE for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:16:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.273
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.273 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.173, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mor_XDbxoSDE for <kitten@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com [205.139.110.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7642F3A08F6 for <kitten@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 May 2020 12:16:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1589310960; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=jVyRHhsRTfZyUM27q1foqLWWmdC/xkffbEP5vU2/Xig=; b=F1FfhNXfGnZIBrb9XPivBIUZvQa6Z4tkC8E4f7tb9OV/l6wK2EN2jP2e1Vy8e5bicflpOt ZjKCTNmINZq5RyTNeNhRcnRQm/A9t61uvif6oXfrwNpfSKL0Hlo1aCqXmgMw8xD3Ayyww+ CpJpCvTh2TA192vQyHd7lpCBNx19JEo=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-64-0_PGFXWgPWO8QtU_6gXWIQ-1; Tue, 12 May 2020 15:15:56 -0400
X-MC-Unique: 0_PGFXWgPWO8QtU_6gXWIQ-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EABBD19200C9; Tue, 12 May 2020 19:15:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.10.110.55]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D4E1CC; Tue, 12 May 2020 19:15:54 +0000 (UTC)
From: Robbie Harwood <rharwood@redhat.com>
To: Sam Whited <sam@samwhited.com>, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: KITTEN Working Group <kitten@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <69821732-1e68-4b76-9c88-847fa069e1db@www.fastmail.com>
References: <feda3e13-dc28-4f8e-8360-90853f649add@www.fastmail.com> <jlg7dxy2rpx.fsf@redhat.com> <23661358-b62e-40ed-b209-0551edf4ac8f@www.fastmail.com> <20200430031415.GJ27494@kduck.mit.edu> <69821732-1e68-4b76-9c88-847fa069e1db@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 15:15:53 -0400
Message-ID: <jlgo8qtvuae.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/lIqxPIZQM_t3qvZNgLrkCODy9HI>
Subject: Re: [kitten] I-D: Best practices for password hashing and storage
X-BeenThere: kitten@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Common Authentication Technologies - Next Generation <kitten.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/kitten/>
List-Post: <mailto:kitten@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/kitten>, <mailto:kitten-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 19:16:04 -0000

"Sam Whited" <sam@samwhited.com> writes:

> In the interest of keeping this moving, it's been a little over a week
> and I've had a bit of review and Dave of course mentioned the initial
> reason he suggested this document be brought here. If anyone else has
> feedback or opinions on whether this should or should not be taken on
> by the WG, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
>
> Otherwise, what are the next steps?
>
> Thanks as always for your help guiding me through this process. I
> really appreciate it.

Thanks for your patience; that delay was longer than I intended.  I've
issued the formal call for adoption; assuming no objections, I'm
inclined to adopt.

Thanks,
--Robbie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email