IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] preliminary review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-preauth-framework-14.txt

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Mon, 31 August 2009 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BA03A6AD1 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.411
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.411 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.188, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6rhao8Rb3+5T for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77583A6E53 for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:49:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5593A; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0008E4B; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F8D80E1B; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:08 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA6080E1A for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) id 91AFA2E; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:06 -0500 (CDT)
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAF734 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879922E for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714647CC07F; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17600-06-8; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay2.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DF07CC0C1 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:49:04 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApoEADOAm0pFGcSy/2dsb2JhbADJcoVliEqEGgWKVA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.44,305,1249275600"; d="scan'208";a="30522538"
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.178]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP; 31 Aug 2009 09:48:57 -0500
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id BD28651C7; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:48:56 -0400 (EDT)
To: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
References: <9C30088742EFE2EAFB92FCF2@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:48:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <9C30088742EFE2EAFB92FCF2@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu> (Jeffrey Hutzelman's message of "Sun\, 30 Aug 2009 15\:25\:03 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslocpwujhj.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] preliminary review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-preauth-framework-14.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> writes:

    Jeffrey> ID-nits points out that this is an old document but does
    Jeffrey> not contain a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 content.  I know
    Jeffrey> the authors are painfully aware of this issue, so I don't
    Jeffrey> think I need to explain it.  Please be sure that such a
    Jeffrey> disclaimer is included if it is needed.

All is in order here.

    Jeffrey> The reference to draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals
    Jeffrey> looks like it should be normative, as it is needed to
    Jeffrey> understand and implement the specification of the
    Jeffrey> kdc-follow-referrals option in section 6.5.2.

My intent from the current text and reading of WG discussion is that
we want to allocate the flag bit here, but normatively describe the
behavior in the referrals draft so as not to delay this draft.

Is that consistent with what we're trying to do?
If so, do you think text clarification is needed?


    Jeffrey> References to draft-ietf-krb-wg-anon,
    Jeffrey> draft-ietf-krb-wg-kerberos-referrals, and
    Jeffrey> draft-sakane-krb-cross-problem-statement are out of date
    Jeffrey> and should be updated.

Will do that, although honestly, I think the RFC editer is great at
this sort of thing.

    Jeffrey> The descriptions of IANA registration policies in section
    Jeffrey> 8 require a normative reference to RFC2434.
I thought we replaced 2434.
Anyway, I'll add a normative reference to whatever is appropriate.

    Jeffrey> This document contains a lot of RFC2119 requirements
    Jeffrey> language, and also many uses of the lowercase words
    Jeffrey> "may", "should", and "required" which are not intended as
    Jeffrey> requirements language.  I did a cursory review and
    Jeffrey> believe these are mostly in order, but it's probably
    Jeffrey> worth rechecking to make sure you haven't left any in
    Jeffrey> lowercase that should be uppercase or vice versa.
I think we're good here.  More eyes can of course always help.

    Jeffrey> I'm pretty sure Joel Weber's name is spelled with only
    Jeffrey> one 'b'.  _______________________________________________

Will fix.

_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email