IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] COMMENT: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-07.txt>

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> Tue, 26 October 2010 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80D393A69C8 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ys2z3P4a77Ax for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4867B3A69BD for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080B651; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:43 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5278941; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:42 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107CA80035; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:42 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBB280033 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) id 78F7411; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:40 -0500 (CDT)
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737C73B for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D76111 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553697CC0A9; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26058-07; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:40 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AABF7CC0A7 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:27:40 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkIAAMurxkyAAtnGkWdsb2JhbAChTRUBAQEBCQsKBxEFHbg7iGeFSASNWw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,242,1286168400"; d="scan'208";a="49598601"
Received: from smtp03.srv.cs.cmu.edu ([128.2.217.198]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2010 12:27:39 -0500
Received: from [18.111.89.246] (SIRIUS.FAC.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.216.216]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp03.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id o9QHRcMZ007803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:27:39 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:27:39 -0400
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
Message-ID: <5D62FEB0A0D0DEE430B0723E@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <EE09C2C7-4339-4AD7-99A7-26844301AC6F@ieca.com>
References: <20101005140047.17747.1204.idtracker@localhost> <B97ABEFBA21CA61E35A5E56C@atlantis.pc.cs.cmu.edu> <EE09C2C7-4339-4AD7-99A7-26844301AC6F@ieca.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Scanned-By: mimedefang-cmuscs on 128.2.217.198
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming@tools.ietf.org, ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov, krb-wg-chairs@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, jhutz@cmu.edu
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] COMMENT: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-naming-07.txt>
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

--On Friday, October 08, 2010 12:04:43 PM -0400 Sean Turner 
<turners@ieca.com> wrote:

>
>>
>>> 3) Sec 1: It would be nice to have some text that indicates say which
>>> parts of 4120 you're updating.  Section 6.1, 6.2, 7.5.7, and 7.5.8
>>> right?
>>
>> Well, we're certainly updating section 6.  Section 7 is essentially the
>> initial contents of a registry (still not maintained by IANA, but we're
>> working on that), so we're effectively adding to the registry.  But this
>> document also does other things, like requiring that compliant
>> implementations reject some requests which previously could have been
>> permitted.  I'm not sure that being more precise is a good idea, but we
>> can certainly discuss it.
>
> If it's easy to do great. If not skip it.

Unfortunately, I don't think it is.
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email