Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04.txt> (Deprecate DES, RC4-HMAC-EXP, and other weak cryptographic algorithms in Kerberos) to Best Current Practice
Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Sat, 24 March 2012 07:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B7121F86B2 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.432
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.432 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.167, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4V4YUKjgJusN for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B7C21F86B0 for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 00:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998017C; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674D76E; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:50 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382CF42BA; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:50 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE1F42B9 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) id 898EB7A; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:48 -0500 (CDT)
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8476A75 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E02A7A for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672D57CC0F7; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32756-07; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E4A7CC0F3 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 02:42:48 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAJh6bU9FGcQc/2dsb2JhbABDuCmBB4IKAQU6PxALIRoLDwEEGIhOtDCBIY4EgyQEpg2DAw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,310,1330927200"; d="scan'208";a="77370843"
Received: from permutation-city.suchdamage.org ([69.25.196.28]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2012 02:42:32 -0500
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (dhcp-40ae.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.64.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F34C820244; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:41:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id D9B314767; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <20120322152611.20184.76979.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 03:42:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20120322152611.20184.76979.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> (The IESG's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:26:11 -0700")
Message-ID: <tslr4wizbq2.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04.txt> (Deprecate DES, RC4-HMAC-EXP, and other weak cryptographic algorithms in Kerberos) to Best Current Practice
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Hi. In the writeup I asked Stephen to include a note that there is a normative downreference to RFC 4757. RFC 4757 is informational. This document recommends that implementations not implement some of the algorithms in RFC 4757, thus creating a normative down-ref. My opinion and that of the WG is that permitting this normative down-reference is the appropriate course of action. _______________________________________________ ietf-krb-wg mailing list ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg