[Ietf-krb-wg] Fwd: RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Wed, 06 June 2012 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EC721F87FF for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:31:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.57
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.57 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.029, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 061leCI5AM-3 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B7D21F87EE for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 04:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2888269; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:31:21 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D0367; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:31:15 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C48481037; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:31:15 -0500 (CDT)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA7381036 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:31:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017547CC08C; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:31:14 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17761-04; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:31:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C3D7CC067 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 06:31:13 -0500 (CDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Am8KAJg+z0+G4iA4XWdsb2JhbABFtEsXCwoHFQUighgBAQEBAwEBAT0BASwKAgsEHAMBAgEJFg8JAwIBAgEVHAoCCAYNBgIBAYgHAQqjR4QuAQWPHgaLFBqFf5YvhC6NG4Fe
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,723,1330927200"; d="scan'208";a="82181004"
Received: from hermes.scss.tcd.ie (HELO scss.tcd.ie) ([134.226.32.56]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2012 06:31:13 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hermes.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A502118F387 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:31:11 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:mime-version:user-agent:from:date:message-id:received :received:x-virus-scanned; s=cs; t=1338982271; bh=DwMwh5a0e22Bed E/W99AIS8EZo1Vv/XEIv/a7xl35es=; b=MOeE4UyYbP7hLpdchUO9mA5npZwknr m6xc/RNeR/styB+r+4Fy7sC07Uqe+pym9SjxivQGufIWPmUTscGZhWS+rfQ5YhCt sTJI6b0wpnXv6qvT+2DkqyasH2htOTt0Eg0HUuugQKqZnI22mcuni/mwdzr0M2sU 2/KgVIGrkwdMB7U+joD4z8i9VRGa5TRTaaKPRjMZ5f9pojtBC0rri/0U19VpcL3+ aNm/wfbJJgSBkABb2GuslLhSZDs5qWetSBl6Sw2d8EncXvpBCGs/lcJVl0nfWT4t gyB9wU0aRGxue7aucbGPGTCdJ4DUei/xNlxiV3d0Y+W3OCTSfFO7JeoQ==
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with ESMTP id Qq3iF3ZhIdqS for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:31:11 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:bd88:d721:7222:9395] (unknown [IPv6:2001:770:10:203:bd88:d721:7222:9395]) by smtp.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5923516F4BC for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:31:10 +0100 (IST)
Message-ID: <4FCF3F7F.7050100@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:31:11 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "krb-wg mailing list (ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov)" <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
References: <4FCF3F47.10205@cs.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <4FCF3F47.10205@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <4FCF3F47.10205@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Subject: [Ietf-krb-wg] Fwd: RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

FYI

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RFC 5742 review of draft-hotz-kx509
Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:30:15 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
To: Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu>, draft-hotz-kx509@tools.ietf.org,
Nevil Brownlee <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>
CC: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>


Hi,

I've done my 5742 review of this and reckon that its doesn't
conflict with the planned work on the topic in the kerberos
WG, so I've put this on the June 21st IESG telechat agenda
for the other ADs to see if they agree or not.

Note that I also had some comments on the text itself. [1]
The authors/ISE might want to take a look at those in the
meantime, in particular the IANA registration comment.
(Authors - I think the right thing here is to do what the
ISE wants in terms of any possible revisions, but from
the IESG point of view, I'd guess changes you might want
to make to address those comments if made in the next week
wouldn't be a problem.)

Cheers,
Stephen.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hotz-kx509/writeup/

On 05/31/2012 12:35 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The independent submissions editor (ISE) has asked the
> IESG to do an RFC 5742 review of this [1] document.
> 
> That review is to check that the publication of this
> independent stream submission would not conflict with
> IETF work.
> 
> In this case, the work is clearly related to the pkix
> and kerberos working groups, hence this mail.
> 
> Note: this mail is not a request for a technical review
> of the content, but rather asking if publication would
> somehow be damaging to the work of these wgs. (If you
> do have technical comments, send them to the author
> or ISE). If you're not sure about any of that, then
> read RFC 5742. [2]
> 
> I'll take silence as meaning that nobody thinks that
> there's a conflict. If someone thinks there is a
> conflict let me, the list, or the wg chairs know. In
> due course, I'll be doing my own evaluation as well
> of course, as will other IESG members.
> 
> Thanks,
> Stephen.
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hotz-kx509-04
> [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5742
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pkix mailing list
> pkix@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pkix
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg