IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-00.txt

Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu> Fri, 09 March 2012 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA7721E8025 for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:56:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7SeIHSIJamHb for <ietfarch-krb-wg-archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5114721E8019 for <krb-wg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 11:56:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id E649A71; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:44 -0600 (CST)
Received: from lists.anl.gov (katydid.it.anl.gov [146.137.96.32]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8C270; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:44 -0600 (CST)
Received: from katydid.it.anl.gov (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F703442BF; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:44 -0600 (CST)
X-Original-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by lists.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A37344281 for <ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) id 7017428; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:43 -0600 (CST)
Delivered-To: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov
Received: from mailhost.anl.gov (mailhost.anl.gov [130.202.113.50]) by localhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B54F6C for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov (mailrelay.anl.gov [130.202.101.22]) by mailhost.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C9728 for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.it.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEA97CC0E4; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mailrelay.anl.gov ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailrelay.anl.gov [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28533-10; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: from mailgateway.anl.gov (mailgateway.anl.gov [130.202.101.28]) by mailrelay.anl.gov (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34EEB7CC09F for <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:56:43 -0600 (CST)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ak4BAPFfWk+AAtnEkWdsb2JhbABDDoUnrHmDBCIBAQEBCQsLBxQFIoIKAQEBAQMjVhALDgoCAiYCAlcGiB2pAIkIiQeBL44zgRYEiFOSXIxiVQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,559,1325484000"; d="scan'208";a="76401276"
Received: from smtp01.srv.cs.cmu.edu ([128.2.217.196]) by mailgateway.anl.gov with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 09 Mar 2012 13:56:42 -0600
Received: from [66.233.146.161] (66-233-146-161.pit.clearwire-wmx.net [66.233.146.161] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp01.srv.cs.cmu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q29Juchg007773 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 9 Mar 2012 14:56:41 -0500 (EST)
From: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <4F59919E.3050907@mit.edu>
References: <1331243905.24486.106.camel@minbar.fac.cs.cmu.edu> <4F59919E.3050907@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:56:38 -0500
Message-ID: <1331322998.3570.20.camel@destiny.pc.cs.cmu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3
X-Scanned-By: mimedefang-cmuscs on 128.2.217.196
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at frigga.it.anl.gov
Cc: "ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov" <ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov>, jhutz@cmu.edu
Subject: Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] review of draft-ietf-krb-wg-camellia-cts-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a list for the IETF Kerberos Working Group. {WORLDPUB, EXTERNAL}" <ietf-krb-wg.lists.anl.gov>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/options/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.anl.gov/pipermail/ietf-krb-wg>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg>, <mailto:ietf-krb-wg-request@lists.anl.gov?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov
Sender: ietf-krb-wg-bounces@lists.anl.gov

On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 00:14 -0500, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On 03/08/2012 04:58 PM, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> > Points 1, 2, 5, 6, and 7 are blockers; they must be resolved before
> > the document can progress.
> 
> I believe all points are taken care of in -01, but some may need
> confirmation.

Yup; it looks like -01 addresses all of my comments.

Is anyone else working on implementing this?
I'd really prefer to have verification of the test vectors if possible,
but I won't hold up publication for that if no one is close to being
able to do so.

-- Jeff

_______________________________________________
ietf-krb-wg mailing list
ietf-krb-wg@lists.anl.gov
https://lists.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ietf-krb-wg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email