Re: [L1vpn] Reviewrequested:draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospfv3-auto-discovery-00.txt

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

I too am fine with either.  Will go with experimental in the next rev 
unless I hear otherwise from the chairs...

Lou

At 08:08 AM 6/16/2008, [e-mail] wrote:
>Hi Adrian.
>
>In that case, if nothing precludes future reconsideration, then the 
>answer is obvious... Anyway, I rely on the chairs (and maybe ADs) to 
>take the appropriate decision about this minor issue.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Julien
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:[e-mail]]
>
>Hi Julien,
>
>My thinking on Experimental was simply that we have absolutely no
>implementation experience of this work. Neither the author nor the WG chairs
>have experience of implementing OSPFv3, and as far as we know, no-one has
>any plans to implement L1VPN autodiscovery with OSPFv3.
>
>I think that the way things go is that once someone has implemented (or
>preferably when we have multiple implementations) we can come back, make any
>changes to the work that are necessary, and republish as standards track.
>
>Cheers,
>Adrian
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <[e-mail]>
>
>Hi all.
>
>With respect to the v2-based solution, the v3 ID says: "The notable
>functional difference is the support of IPv6." If it's actually the only
>difference (I haven't deeply reviewed the new ID yet), is there a point
>to make the draft Experimental? It is indeed likely to be implemented in
>a longer term than the former one, but it is mainly a matter of schedule
>towards IPv6. As the feature itself should look like the OSPFv2-based
>solution, I'm rather in favor of "Standards Track", but maybe you have
>some other reasons in mind (speed up publishing process?).
>
>Regards,
>
>Julien
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf
>Of Adrian Farrel
>
>L1VPN and OSPF working groups,
>
>During the IESG review of draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-06.txt,
>the
>IESG asked the L1VPN working group to consider how to use OSPFv3 to
>provide
>IPv6-compliant auto-discovery for layer one VPNs. They agreed to let us
>do
>this work in a separate draft.
>
>Lou Berger has kindly turned the handle and this is the result.
>
>We intend to move forward toward WG last call with this work quite
>quickly,
>and so we would appreciate you review, comments, and feedback.
>
>To start the discussion, please comment on whether you believe this
>draft
>should be Standards Track (as currently marked) or Experimental? It
>seems
>that there are no immediate plans for any implementation that would
>verify
>that the document is correct or stable.
>
>Many thanks,
>Adrian
>
> >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> >directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks
>Working
> > Group of the IETF.
> >
> > Title           : OSPFv3 Based Layer 1 VPN Auto-Discovery
> > Author(s)       : L. Berger
> > Filename        : draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospfv3-auto-discovery-00.txt
> > Pages           : 11
> > Date            : 2008-06-11
> >
> > This document defines an Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) version 3
> > based Layer-1 Virtual Private Network (L1VPN) auto-discovery
> > mechanism.  This document parallels the existing OSPF version 2 L1VPN
> > auto-discovery mechanism.  The notable functional difference is the
> > support of IPv6.
> >
> > A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
> >
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospfv3-auto-discove
>ry-00.txt
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>L1vpn mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>L1vpn mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn

_______________________________________________
L1vpn mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn