Re: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group documents
Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be Wed, 12 April 2006 20:22 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTlrD-0001u3-8S; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:22:31 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTlrC-0001tP-4A for l1vpn@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:22:30 -0400
Received: from smail.alcatel.fr ([62.23.212.165]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FTlrB-0006WW-M2 for l1vpn@ietf.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 16:22:30 -0400
Received: from bemail05.netfr.alcatel.fr (bemail05.netfr.alcatel.fr [155.132.251.11]) by smail.alcatel.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k3CKMTjL018253; Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:22:29 +0200
In-Reply-To: <0f2301c65e19$c0d1b500$bf849ed9@Puppy>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group documents
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5 September 26, 2003
Message-ID: <OFE50529BF.747DFBE0-ONC125714E.006199FE-C125714E.006FEAA2@netfr.alcatel.fr>
From: Dimitri.Papadimitriou@alcatel.be
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:22:26 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on BEMAIL05/BE/ALCATEL(Release 5.0.12HF868 | May 16, 2005) at 04/12/2006 22:22:27, Serialize complete at 04/12/2006 22:22:27
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 155.132.180.81
X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8de5f93cb2b4e3bee75302e9eacc33db
Cc: l1vpn@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: l1vpn@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 1 Virtual Private Networks <l1vpn.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn>, <mailto:l1vpn-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/l1vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l1vpn@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l1vpn-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn>, <mailto:l1vpn-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: l1vpn-bounces@lists.ietf.org
> draft-fedyk-l1vpn-basic-mode-01.txt > ---->draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-00.txt yes > draft-ouldbrahim-l1vpn-bgp-auto-discovery-01.txt > ---->draft-ietf-l1vpn-bgp-auto-discovery-00.txt see below 1 > draft-bryskin-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-01.txt > ---->draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-00.txt see below 2 1. if the discovery process (PE-PE) is also including TDM service over PSN there is a broader community involved in this discussion otherwise - ok - 2. charter says "At this point the WG will address the single-AS scenario only. The multi-AS/provider scenario may be considered in future." but we never got a clear answer whether this wg wants to have the same solution for both scenarios and we do not have much info from fmw doc nor from the list the only thing i know from the list is that operator(s) are not willing to have two solutions for the same problem - but basically i see two distinct problems we could solve in a single AS context for which you could have different starting points - single-AS core backbone running already an IGP and connecting core routers - single-AS STM-N infrastucture to provide LO/HO VC connectivity that could be expanded to multi-AS i would say both but i put a warning on the IGP-based solution whether the multi-area case is the prime focus, i read this draft as trying to compete with the functionality of the BGP single-AS case while it is not clear at all this is relevant "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> 12/04/2006 12:13 Please respond to Adrian Farrel To: <l1vpn@ietf.org> cc: Subject: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group documents Hi, In Dallas we agreed that we wanted to take the three basic mode I-Ds into the working group. This email is to formally ask you for approval or issues with adopting these drafts as follows... draft-fedyk-l1vpn-basic-mode-01.txt ---->draft-ietf-l1vpn-basic-mode-00.txt draft-ouldbrahim-l1vpn-bgp-auto-discovery-01.txt ---->draft-ietf-l1vpn-bgp-auto-discovery-00.txt draft-bryskin-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-01.txt ---->draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery-00.txt Opinions please. Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ L1vpn mailing list L1vpn@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn _______________________________________________ L1vpn mailing list L1vpn@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l1vpn
- [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group doc… Adrian Farrel
- RE: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Don Fedyk
- Re: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Igor Bryskin
- RE: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Drake, John E
- RE: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… MEURIC Julien RD-CORE-LAN
- Re: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Lou Berger
- Re: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Loa Andersson
- RE: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Richard Rabbat
- Re: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Dimitri.Papadimitriou
- Re: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Kohei Shiomoto
- RE: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Rich Bradford (rbradfor)
- RE: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… inoue.ichiro@lab.ntt.co.jp
- Re: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Tomohiro Otani
- RE: [L1vpn] Proposals for three new working group… Brungard, Deborah A, ALABS