[L2sm] [Errata Rejected] RFC8466 (6384)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 12 January 2024 17:40 UTC

To: jlucek@juniper.net, bin_wen@comcast.com, giuseppe.fioccola@tim.it, xiechf.bri@chinatelecom.cn, luay.jalil@verizon.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: rwilton@cisco.com, iesg@ietf.org, l2sm@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20240112174035.9E2951B65DCC@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 09:40:35 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2sm/37fwKwha0lmS1fl8MpbXUrD1InA>
Subject: [L2sm] [Errata Rejected] RFC8466 (6384)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8466,
"A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6384

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Julian Lucek <jlucek@juniper.net>
Date Reported: 2021-01-08
Rejected by: Robert Wilton (IESG)

Section: 8

Original Text
-------------
identity pbb-evpn {
base service-type;
description
"Provider Backbone Bridge (PBB) service type using
EVPNs as specified in RFC 7432.";
}

Corrected Text
--------------
identity evpn {
base service-type;
description
"EVPN service type as specified in RFC 7432.";
}

Notes
-----
The mention of PBB is a mistake, it should be normal (non-PBB) EVPN, given that Section 3.1 lists EVPN and not PBB-EVPN among the supported L2VPN types. However, the reference to RFC 7432 in the original text box above is correct, as that RFC deals with EVPN, not PBB-EVPN.

(n.b. see erratum 5921 that has the "opposite" interpretation, i.e. that pbb-evpn is correct but that the RFC number is wrong)

--VERIFIER NOTES--
I think that this errata report can be regarded as a duplicate of 5922, that I have resolved as "held for document update". Certainly, I don't think that it is possible to infer consensus that the YANG module is wrong by defining pbb-evpn but the accompanying text is correct.

--------------------------------------
RFC8466 (draft-ietf-l2sm-l2vpn-service-model-10)
--------------------------------------
Title : A YANG Data Model for Layer 2 Virtual Private Network (L2VPN) Service Delivery
Publication Date : October 2018
Author(s) : B. Wen, G. Fioccola, Ed., C. Xie, L. Jalil
Category : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source : L2VPN Service Model
Area : Operations and Management
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG

[L2sm] [Errata Rejected] RFC8466 (6384) RFC Errata System