Re: [L2tpext] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** IPR Poll for draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00
<rainer.schatzmayr@telekom.de> Fri, 08 November 2013 13:17 UTC
Return-Path: <rainer.schatzmayr@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237FC21E8088 for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 05:17:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SXLDHsoCXrse for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 05:17:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tcmail33.telekom.de (tcmail33.telekom.de [80.149.113.247]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE36D21E80F8 for <l2tpext@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 05:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from he101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.92.153]) by tcmail31.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 08 Nov 2013 14:17:40 +0100
Received: from HE113421.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([169.254.1.187]) by HE101250.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([fe80::e439:4046:12e2:e37%14]) with mapi; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 14:17:40 +0100
From: rainer.schatzmayr@telekom.de
To: cpignata@cisco.com
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 14:17:38 +0100
Thread-Topic: ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** IPR Poll for draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00
Thread-Index: Ac7chObfnwBo1D+FRPy7jjI8TYOltQ==
Message-ID: <C8CF0127-B3F8-4786-A048-E973490AC1BF@telekom.de>
References: <29658251.38705.1383916468605.JavaMail.trustmail@he111467>
In-Reply-To: <29658251.38705.1383916468605.JavaMail.trustmail@he111467>
Accept-Language: en-US, de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US, de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 05:21:29 -0800
Cc: draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel@tools.ietf.org, l2tpext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [L2tpext] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** IPR Poll for draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00
X-BeenThere: l2tpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions <l2tpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2tpext>
List-Post: <mailto:l2tpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 13:17:48 -0000
I'm not aware about any IPR. Am 08.11.2013 um 14:14 schrieb "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>: > WG, > > The authors of draft-mkonstan-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-00 have requested that l2tpext adopt this draft as a WG document. > > Before we start the call for adoption, we will do an IPR poll. > > Authors and Contributors, > > Please respond to the list indicating whether or not you are aware of any IPR relevant and applicable to this draft. If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? > > If you are on the L2tpext mailing list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please only respond if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. > > The draft will not progress until we have received a response from each author/contributor. > > Thanks!! > > -- Carlos, as L2tpext co-chair. > > <TrustMail_Info.html>
- Re: [L2tpext] ***CAUTION_Invalid_Signature*** IPR… rainer.schatzmayr