[L2tpext] Keyed IPv6 Tunnels
"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Tue, 14 April 2015 20:48 UTC
Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70CA1B2A6E for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nWp9cYQDbCJS for <l2tpext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D84861A1B2E for <l2tpext@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:48:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1373; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1429044485; x=1430254085; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=pOjdnkmfNcCumsQYmNSLeXzykJg1R3GKk3dmA0T0lG0=; b=JKxf937uZz2j10vGprwl7Qm1nK0cRWzARNeFS1qWXg9yUySEPigTQD9p 3vSpsZiAYAwoIy5xq/s/hTjL/KHZcwfB4TYn8vGoyCTcO+sHtetIC8VIN FYag2VAj/G3NEJ8VXhPHO64yygj5GLr5Cgyg4KY6OyqoHyX43pqEIHm+5 c=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 203
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BWBADoey1V/5xdJa1cgwyBM4MQwXBmCYkaOBQBAQEBAQEBfYQmI2gBSgI0JwQhiBylY49VlX8BAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEckxYvgRYFkQ6BboEzhnCBHYM3kBgig2+CM38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,577,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="141141447"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Apr 2015 20:48:05 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3EKm5Vo025699 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <l2tpext@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:48:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.188]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:48:04 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "l2tpext@ietf.org" <l2tpext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Keyed IPv6 Tunnels
Thread-Index: AQHQdvRNDFOPV7qzU0OGaN+vzRdiJw==
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:48:48 +0000
Message-ID: <3BCB0ACD-187A-40E3-AA82-2CC4E5B72C03@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.82.242.11]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D063F314-0423-4467-9D60-15F5A09F21E5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2tpext/Z4hYMJri8qL3AxXEAi-FNlBQIYw>
Subject: [L2tpext] Keyed IPv6 Tunnels
X-BeenThere: l2tpext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer Two Tunneling Protocol Extensions <l2tpext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2tpext/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2tpext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2tpext>, <mailto:l2tpext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 20:48:08 -0000
L2TPExt, There are currently two active documents covering $subject. I wanted to checkpoint their progress and ask for next actions. 1. draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-04 A new revision of this WG draft was published recently, incorporating all comments received (both in L2TPExt as well as in the review request to 6Man). I would like to ask the WG to continue to review this document, which seems to be maturing nicely. 2. draft-sun-l2tpext-keyed-v6-tunnel-yang-00 This is a -00 individual submission, dependent on #1, posted also recently. I’ve not seen much (any) discussion on list yet. WG, please review! Thanks, — Carlos.
- [L2tpext] Keyed IPv6 Tunnels Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)