IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-03 - extended call

Raymond Key <raymond.key@ieee.org> Tue, 04 December 2012 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <raymond.key@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E6F21F866F for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:29:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_65=0.6, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZgCOmRuNt7jg for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from snt0-omc3-s10.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc3-s10.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F27421F863F for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SNT123-W19 ([65.55.90.137]) by snt0-omc3-s10.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 05:29:03 -0800
X-Originating-IP: [113.87.133.45]
X-EIP: [pZpocuYTwVOSpVUGX18rbb89FYOy5SOw]
X-Originating-Email: [raymond.key@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <SNT123-W191DC29A6040D26ED42C9EF4470@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_16de1ec5-dd8a-4425-91db-06d98c458497_"
From: Raymond Key <raymond.key@ieee.org>
Sender: raymond.key@hotmail.com
To: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com, l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-03 - extended call
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 00:29:01 +1100
Importance: High
In-Reply-To: <CCDE1CF0.6BC8F%nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>
References: <CCB93484.66BF5%nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>, <CCDE1CF0.6BC8F%nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Dec 2012 13:29:03.0898 (UTC) FILETIME=[5405FFA0:01CDD223]
Cc: giheron@cisco.com
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 13:29:06 -0000

Hi L2VPN WG I support moving the draft forward.  I am author of the draft. In the WG adoption polling last year (29 Sep 2011 - 13 Oct 2011), there were sixteen responses on the mailing list and all are Yes.  Three of the sixteen responses were from authors. As far as I can remember, there have been no significant changes after the draft was adopted.00 --> 01: Add section 5.4 "External Network Network Interface", following MEF published MEF 26.101 --> 02: Refer to "L2VPN" instead of "VPLS", in response to WG Chairs' comment02 --> 03: Refer to "Multipoint L2VPN" instead of "L2VPN", in response to Ali's comment Thanks,Raymond Key From: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 11:02:02 -0500
Subject: [l2vpn]  WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-03 - extended	call
CC: giheron@cisco.com


Hi,The WG last call passed without any feedback. We would like the working group to take another look at this because it will be hard to gage support for a draft or move it forward without feedback. Thus, we decided to give it another try.. We are issuing or extending the  WG Last call for the draft   “Requirements for MEF E-Tree Support in L2VPN” which can be found at  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-03
Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group email list.  Please, indicate if you support moving the draft forward.You are encouraged to send extensive comments as you see fit.
The extended Working group last call will close on Friday December 7, 2012.
Thanks,Nabil & Giles




From:  <Bitar>, Nabil Bitar <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>
Date:  Friday, November 2, 2012 7:43 AM
To:  "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Cc:  Giles Heron <giheron@cisco.com>
Subject:  [l2vpn]  WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-03


[l2vpn]  WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-vpls-macflush-ld-01Hi,
This is the start of a two-week working group last call on the draft
“Requirements for MEF E-Tree
 Support in L2VPN”.  The draft can be found at  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-03

Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working group email list. You are encouraged to send extensive comments as you see fit.


This WG last call will close on Friday November 16th, 2012.

 

Regards,

Giles & Nabil

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email