RE: L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8
"Sam Cao" <yuqun.cao@gmail.com> Thu, 30 August 2012 11:20 UTC
Return-Path: <yuqun.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49B521F8615 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I8c-an2LDBRn for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F351721F8607 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so2865926pbb.31 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=uRJ39GcRMmkRNYKKzBQX/er/bHxcojOR97Jf5Q0Xgj0=; b=Shvmipp1S/PZ5rbk0xHDdRwxc5N2kSYMNCEe+OZr4qp5OF0kydsszy6qAwxZzWwi8K MWGc1I87CaeKnD4SeW9kile+wyzff5RaYwfAxshRMDMXaY2UfdtnFKwxzUBkPGgJZd6r X7rvmaiydJbkymT42qJHQmX3avdiwJWcjkTJs56p/gkH99lAnHyME+IxkXwbgtwdLsLk 4RUGr2Rn26s+MyHS9w39hRwpGQ4jwYl7DKLY4MZk67jGsopQX4UJRqSeHQU/+SGc4OsG +TBOnf8Iu7OWZuWlGKS4DOiP9ssg/bFMvhKDMOSdihcPnDra57bX9pHLsWrzDGY9X74h NPNQ==
Received: by 10.68.132.3 with SMTP id oq3mr11452118pbb.58.1346325647538; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Server ([112.111.63.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hc10sm1418817pbc.21.2012.08.30.04.20.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sam Cao <yuqun.cao@gmail.com>
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
References: <mailman.5.1346266802.2933.l2vpn@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.5.1346266802.2933.l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:27:46 +0800
Message-ID: <000f01cd86a2$7e65b0f0$7b3112d0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIPYqQrz7Kn1pX8xNIeouQbO8T4Xpbuf0dw
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:20:48 -0000
Support. Also ask for WG adoption for draft-ram-l2vpn-etree-multiple-pw-01. Thanks, Sam -----Original Message----- From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of l2vpn-request@ietf.org Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:00 AM To: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8 If you have received this digest without all the individual message attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list subscription. To do so, go to https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get MIME or Plain Text Digests?" to MIME. You can set this option globally for all the list digests you receive at this point. Send L2vpn mailing list submissions to l2vpn@ietf.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to l2vpn-request@ietf.org You can reach the person managing the list at l2vpn-owner@ietf.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of L2vpn digest..." Today's Topics: 1. RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support (Raymond Key) 2. Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support (Andrew G. Malis) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:10:00 +1030 From: Raymond Key <raymond.key@ieee.org> To: <giles.heron@gmail.com>, <l2vpn@ietf.org> Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Message-ID: <SNT123-W891ADF0AE804048C9CE4CF4A00@phx.gbl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Support > From: giles.heron@gmail.com > Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support > Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:03:44 +0100 > To: l2vpn@ietf.org > > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of > the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we > make decisions :) > > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. > > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/attachments/20120829/ae94ea5b/at tachment.html> ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:17:31 +0300 From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org Subject: Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support Message-ID: <CAA=duU2N7PB73asuM9wmb=4q4jdmAOWTHqGKq+k976YKLAsSFQ@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Support. Cheers, Andy On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote: > This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06 > > should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft. > > We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of > the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we > make decisions :) > > Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in Vancouver and there was very little support. If multiple people email me asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also. > > Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption. > > Giles ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ L2vpn mailing list L2vpn@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn End of L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8 ************************************