RE: L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8

"Sam Cao" <yuqun.cao@gmail.com> Thu, 30 August 2012 11:20 UTC

Return-Path: <yuqun.cao@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49B521F8615 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I8c-an2LDBRn for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F351721F8607 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbbrr4 with SMTP id rr4so2865926pbb.31 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=uRJ39GcRMmkRNYKKzBQX/er/bHxcojOR97Jf5Q0Xgj0=; b=Shvmipp1S/PZ5rbk0xHDdRwxc5N2kSYMNCEe+OZr4qp5OF0kydsszy6qAwxZzWwi8K MWGc1I87CaeKnD4SeW9kile+wyzff5RaYwfAxshRMDMXaY2UfdtnFKwxzUBkPGgJZd6r X7rvmaiydJbkymT42qJHQmX3avdiwJWcjkTJs56p/gkH99lAnHyME+IxkXwbgtwdLsLk 4RUGr2Rn26s+MyHS9w39hRwpGQ4jwYl7DKLY4MZk67jGsopQX4UJRqSeHQU/+SGc4OsG +TBOnf8Iu7OWZuWlGKS4DOiP9ssg/bFMvhKDMOSdihcPnDra57bX9pHLsWrzDGY9X74h NPNQ==
Received: by 10.68.132.3 with SMTP id oq3mr11452118pbb.58.1346325647538; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Server ([112.111.63.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hc10sm1418817pbc.21.2012.08.30.04.20.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 04:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sam Cao <yuqun.cao@gmail.com>
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
References: <mailman.5.1346266802.2933.l2vpn@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <mailman.5.1346266802.2933.l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:27:46 +0800
Message-ID: <000f01cd86a2$7e65b0f0$7b3112d0$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIPYqQrz7Kn1pX8xNIeouQbO8T4Xpbuf0dw
Content-Language: zh-cn
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:20:48 -0000

Support. Also ask for WG adoption for draft-ram-l2vpn-etree-multiple-pw-01.

Thanks,

Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
l2vpn-request@ietf.org
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 3:00 AM
To: l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8

If you have received this digest without all the individual message
attachments you will need to update your digest options in your list
subscription.  To do so, go to 

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn

Click the 'Unsubscribe or edit options' button, log in, and set "Get MIME or
Plain Text Digests?" to MIME.  You can set this option globally for all the
list digests you receive at this point.



Send L2vpn mailing list submissions to
	l2vpn@ietf.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	l2vpn-request@ietf.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	l2vpn-owner@ietf.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of L2vpn digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
      (Raymond Key)
   2. Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
      (Andrew G. Malis)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:10:00 +1030
From: Raymond Key <raymond.key@ieee.org>
To: <giles.heron@gmail.com>, <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Message-ID: <SNT123-W891ADF0AE804048C9CE4CF4A00@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"


Support
 > From: giles.heron@gmail.com
> Subject: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:03:44 +0100
> To: l2vpn@ietf.org
> 
> This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06
> 
> should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.
> 
> We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of 
> the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we 
> make decisions :)
> 
> Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in
Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me
asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.
> 
> Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th
with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.
> 
> Giles
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/attachments/20120829/ae94ea5b/at
tachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:17:31 +0300
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
To: Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com>
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org
Subject: Re: WG adoption call for VPLS PE Model for E-Tree Support
Message-ID:
	<CAA=duU2N7PB73asuM9wmb=4q4jdmAOWTHqGKq+k976YKLAsSFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Support.

Cheers,
Andy

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Giles Heron <giles.heron@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a request to gauge consensus as to whether:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-l2vpn-vpls-pe-etree-06
>
> should be accepted as an L2VPN WG draft.
>
> We discussed adoption of this draft in Vancouver, and the consensus of 
> the room seemed to be to adopt it, but of course the list is where we 
> make decisions :)
>
> Note that we also discussed adoption of the other VPLS E-Tree drafts in
Vancouver and there was very little support.    If multiple people email me
asking to adopt one or other of those drafts I'll poll that one also.
>
> Please review the draft and respond to the list by Thursday September 6th
with comments as to its suitability for WG adoption.
>
> Giles


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
L2vpn mailing list
L2vpn@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn


End of L2vpn Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8
************************************