Re: Polling for IPR on the E-Tree Requirements draft draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-04

"Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 05 April 2013 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B3121F853D for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 03:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5MqaWuoQhasb for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 03:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AEE21F845A for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 03:23:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-5-2-63.lucent.com [135.5.2.63]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id r35ANDg4012082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Apr 2013 05:23:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (us70uwxchhub01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com [135.5.2.48]) by us70tusmtp1.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id r35AN8rN026261 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Apr 2013 06:23:12 -0400
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (135.239.2.111) by US70UWXCHHUB01.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.48) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.247.3; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 06:23:09 -0400
Received: from FR711WXCHMBA07.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.3.160]) by FR711WXCHHUB01.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.111]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 12:23:02 +0200
From: "Henderickx, Wim (Wim)" <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>, "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Polling for IPR on the E-Tree Requirements draft draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-04
Thread-Topic: Polling for IPR on the E-Tree Requirements draft draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-04
Thread-Index: AQHOMeeNGBlEiFOwf06+atUJKRkJ1g==
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:23:02 +0000
Message-ID: <CD8472A2.475E2%wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD7FCADC.7CCF2%nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.38]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CD8472A2475E2wimhenderickxalcatellucentcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
Cc: Giles Heron <giheron@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 10:23:19 -0000

Not aware of IPR

From: <Bitar>, Nabil Bitar <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com<mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>>
Date: Thursday 4 April 2013 20:11
To: "l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>" <l2vpn@ietf.org<mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>>
Cc: Giles Heron <giheron@cisco.com<mailto:giheron@cisco.com>>
Subject: Polling for IPR on the E-Tree Requirements draft draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-04

Hi,

We are polling for knowledge of any IPR that applies to draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-04, Requirements for MEF E-Tree Support in L2VPN, in order to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

If you are listed as a document author or contributor,  please respond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not been properly disclosed. The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from each author and contributor.

If you are on the l2vpn WG email list but are not listed as an author or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. The draft can be found at https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-04<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-reqt-03>

This poll closes on Thursday April 11, 2013.

Thanks,
Nabil & Giles