IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Concern regarding draft-kompella-l2vpn-vpls-multihoming-01

Bhupesh Kothari <bhupesh@juniper.net> Fri, 29 August 2008 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: l2vpn-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-l2vpn-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75523A686B; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:47:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02BE3A67F2 for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:47:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tO62grp+n24X for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chip3og55.obsmtp.com (chip3og55.obsmtp.com [64.18.14.175]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1253A686B for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([66.129.228.6]) by chip3ob55.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:47:36 PDT
Received: from p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net ([66.129.254.47]) by p-emsmtp01.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:02:10 -0700
Received: from emailsmtp56.jnpr.net ([172.24.60.77]) by p-emlb02-sac.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:02:10 -0700
Received: from magenta.juniper.net ([172.17.27.123]) by emailsmtp56.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:01:33 -0700
Received: from bhupesh-f8.jnpr.net (bhupesh-f8.jnpr.net [172.24.24.195]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id m7TJ1Xu09422; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:01:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bhupesh@juniper.net)
Received: from bhupesh-f8.jnpr.net (localhost6.localdomain6 [127.0.0.1]) by bhupesh-f8.jnpr.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7TJ1WsX008634; Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:01:33 -0700
To: HENDERICKX Wim <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.be>
Subject: Re: Concern regarding draft-kompella-l2vpn-vpls-multihoming-01
In-reply-to: <B128F666D4C8BD4FBF56CEAFB2DB66D703265842@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
References: <B128F666D4C8BD4FBF56CEAFB2DB66D702F859BF@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com><21222.1217875881@bhupesh-f8.jnpr.net><B128F666D4C8BD4FBF56CEAFB2DB66D70302C011@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com><27924.1217882240@bhupesh-f8.jnpr.net> <B128F666D4C8BD4FBF56CEAFB2DB66D70302C095@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com> <483F121CD2155B43B56DB71228DBAF1502209660@xmb-sjc-239.amer.cisco.com> <B128F666D4C8BD4FBF56CEAFB2DB66D703265842@FRVELSMBS22.ad2.ad.alcatel.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 22.1.1
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 12:01:32 -0700
Message-ID: <8633.1220036492@bhupesh-f8.jnpr.net>
From: Bhupesh Kothari <bhupesh@juniper.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Aug 2008 19:01:33.0358 (UTC) FILETIME=[A73D84E0:01C90A09]
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org, "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <sajassi@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: l2vpn-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Wim,

HENDERICKX Wim <wim.henderickx@alcatel-lucent.be> wrote:

> Ali,
> 
> This is the same concern I raised in the emails before and will be
> difficult to solve if you let the remote PE(s) make a decision for
> multi-homing.

I thought I addressed all you MAC flush concerns. :-) 

As I said, MAC flush capability in BGP based VPLS will be added to
address the concern you pointed out (with multiple VE IDs) and other
cases where MAC flush is needed.

Can you be specific on what is your open concern. 

> 
> Cheers,
> Wim 

Thanks
Bhupesh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email