RE: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-15.txt

"Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com> Thu, 27 January 2011 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <prvs=4008a44417=hshah@ciena.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C2828C14D for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:45:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vBeBJx4LzKTd for <l2vpn@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:45:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com [67.231.152.227]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB083A67F7 for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:45:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0001124 [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with SMTP id p0RIeNdl022305; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:48:12 -0500
Received: from mdwexght01.ciena.com (LIN1-118-36-28.ciena.com [63.118.36.28]) by mx0b-00103a01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id u3dsfg35b-1 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:48:12 -0500
Received: from mdmxm05.ciena.com (63.118.39.23) by MDWEXGHT01.ciena.com (10.4.140.138) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.436.0; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:48:12 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBBE52.A6AA0D59"
Subject: RE: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-15.txt
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 13:47:28 -0500
Message-ID: <B281F185E514BB4CB7EF182F9CA158BE01CA72CE@mdmxm05.ciena.com>
In-Reply-To: <OF3879CF51.3C226505-ON482577F9.000393E7-482577FC.0024799D@zte.com.cn>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [l2vpn] WG last call for draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-15.txt
Thread-Index: AcudtQ6qihChKxohTJecfYymBxbONQgnSDAQ
References: <mailman.3792.1291743700.4946.l2vpn@ietf.org> <OF3879CF51.3C226505-ON482577F9.000393E7-482577FC.0024799D@zte.com.cn>
From: "Shah, Himanshu" <hshah@ciena.com>
To: lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn, nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15, 1.0.148, 0.0.0000 definitions=2011-01-27_08:2011-01-27, 2011-01-27, 1970-01-01 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=100 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1101270120
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org, giheron@cisco.com
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:45:31 -0000

Sorry for late reply..

In line..

 

 

From: lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn [mailto:lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn] 
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 1:38 AM
To: nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com
Cc: l2vpn@ietf.org; giheron@cisco.com; Shah, Himanshu
Subject: Re: [l2vpn] WG last call for
draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-15.txt

 


Yes, support. 



HS> Thanks

 

But have two minor comments. 
1. In section 7.1 and 7.2, what is the reserved value, 0x0000? Should be
specified. 

 

HS> Yes and OK


2. In section 7.1, if PE withdrawS its PW label with the LDP status code
meaning "IP Address type mismatch", when will the PE send the label
mapping again? It is possible for the remote PE to change its
configuration to IPv6 and send a new label mapping again to local PE, in
this case, will the local PE be triggered to send label mapping again? 

 

HS> Yes. Will clarify that.  

In previous thread, I had mentioned that in my opinion, ideally speaking
this item should be covered in the base signaling draft.

Irrespective, will add the verbiage.

 

Thanks,

himanshu



Thanks 
Lizhong 


> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:11:15 -0500
> From: "Bitar, Nabil N" <nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>
> Subject: [l2vpn] WG last call for
>    draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-15.txt
> To: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
> Cc: Giles Heron <giheron@cisco.com>, "Shah, Himanshu"
>    <hshah@ciena.com>
> Message-ID: <C923AAB3.10E11%nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> This is the start of a two-week working group last call on draft 
> "ARP Mediation for IP Interworking of Layer 2 VPN".
> The draft can be found at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-
> l2vpn-arp-mediation-15 .
> 
> Please, review the draft and send any comments to the L2VPN working 
> group email list.
> 
> This WG last call will close on Tuesday December 21st, 2010.
> 
> Regards,
> Nabil
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-
> archive/web/l2vpn/attachments/20101207/df019938/attachment.htm>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 

 
--------------------------------------------------------
ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail
is solely property of the sender's organization. This mail communication
is confidential. Recipients named above are obligated to maintain
secrecy and are not permitted to disclose the contents of this
communication to others.
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the
originator of the message. Any views expressed in this message are those
of the individual sender.
This message has been scanned for viruses and Spam by ZTE Anti-Spam
system.