RE: AD review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk

Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com> Tue, 01 July 2014 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F186D1A034F for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 07:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v6cEuXijkQs6 for <l2vpn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 07:48:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362B01A033B for <l2vpn@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 07:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BGR43535; Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:47:59 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DFWEML704-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.141) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 15:47:59 +0100
Received: from DFWEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.95]) by dfweml704-chm.china.huawei.com ([169.254.6.218]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 1 Jul 2014 07:47:55 -0700
From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, "draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk
Thread-Topic: AD review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-etree-frwk
Thread-Index: Ac+VKNbK7L9DFlaMQpybP0Am8ll+tQAEQ0aw
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:47:55 +0000
Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D453B09ED@dfweml701-chm.china.huawei.com>
References: <05fe01cf9528$ff1aa340$fd4fe9c0$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <05fe01cf9528$ff1aa340$fd4fe9c0$@olddog.co.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.132.117]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l2vpn/kmRppG0HRZfv6uLR3rpC-9phwV0
Cc: "l2vpn@ietf.org" <l2vpn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: l2vpn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks <l2vpn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/l2vpn/>
List-Post: <mailto:l2vpn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l2vpn>, <mailto:l2vpn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:48:03 -0000

Hi Adrian,


===

Section 2.2 has

   An E-Tree service has one or more Root ACs and many Leaf ACs.

I suggest that "many" is not a necessary part of the definition although it may be probable in deployments. For the definition I think you need:

   An E-Tree service has one or more Root ACs and at least one Leaf AC.
[Lucy] Since one key of E-tree service is prohibiting the communication between leaf ACs. Therefore, one leaf AC case does not make sense. How about: An E-Tree service has one or more Root ACs and at least two Leaf ACs. 

---

Section 2.3.1 para 2

s/fame/frame/
[Lucy] will change it. Thanks.

---

Figure 1 shows two notations "E-Tree". The associated arrows do not make it clear what is the extent of the E-tree since the top one and the bottom one show different edge points. Can you tidy that up?
[Lucy] I'll fix it.

Regards,
Lucy