[L3sm] Pardon me [Was: #1 (draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model): When is customer-nat-address used?]
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 27 August 2015 10:16 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A101B3277 for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 03:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUPuowlZ6Diq for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 03:15:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B96CB1B31EC for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 03:15:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t7RAFrvg030160; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:15:53 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (host86-142-8-151.range86-142.btcentralplus.com [86.142.8.151]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t7RAFpAG030131 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:15:52 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@tools.ietf.org
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 11:15:48 +0100
Message-ID: <05cd01d0e0b1$594d0f40$0be72dc0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdDgsLpcImhfjwrtQz+VH/TDHA7oXA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1576-8.0.0.1202-21774.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.107-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--5.107-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: 90G6ca/P0SNR2cR2TyQKnnY+p3RAnPX0nophrTcsI7badW4iYSMjUUDJ cYxjRM/Vdq4yx8FeP6j+phYguKO0FNS4xBx+9nm0lVHM/F6YkvQrHkgIan9a0Rd2FPQEB0XO+lm NZCKoGWF4yFzsduAoZAbOsI1FoLDbP9zr8/KmsXz+OTCJja0mct9WrDP4LKdpmyiLZetSf8my5/ tFZu9S3Ku6xVHLhqfxWBd6ltyXuvvidh1fjYF7ZYHISzbPJCnfkuv1qu3IhpqkL9KntyhdkXCzV KzxBwnGv+nyojCgQcMCAkqrYLTZ1P83A/jf4FQkIG2TQa3KHRPoer1EJMvG+yy0eZxd5bV4FVIZ bguNbjQVic9Khd8bx43dNLmVO1nyftwZ3X11IV0=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3sm/KPxnKqZ6q5JzP2IsdpS32WuGEaQ>
Cc: l3sm@ietf.org
Subject: [L3sm] Pardon me [Was: #1 (draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model): When is customer-nat-address used?]
X-BeenThere: l3sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: L3VPN Service YANG Model discussion group <l3sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l3sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:16:02 -0000
I'm just experimenting with the trouble ticket system to see whether it does what we need. Rapidly reaching the conclusion that it does not. Will fiddle a little more before moving to the wiki. Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: l3sm issue tracker [mailto:trac+l3sm@tools.ietf.org] > Sent: 27 August 2015 11:09 > To: draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@tools.ietf.org; adrian@olddog.co.uk > Cc: l3sm@ietf.org > Subject: [l3sm] #1 (draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model): When is customer-nat- > address used? > > #1: When is customer-nat-address used? > > Issue raised by Aijun Wang (wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn) > > What is the scenario where the leaf "customer-nat-address" will be used? > If the customer being provided one public address, why use NAT? if use > NAT, why allocate such "customer-nat-address"? > > -- > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > Reporter: adrian@olddog.co.uk | Owner: draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn- > Type: enhancement | service-model@tools.ietf.org > Priority: minor | Status: new > Component: draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn- | Milestone: > service-model | Version: > Severity: - | Keywords: NAT > -------------------------------------+------------------------------------- > > Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/l3sm/trac/ticket/1> > l3sm <http://tools.ietf.org/l3sm/>
- [L3sm] Pardon me [Was: #1 (draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-… Adrian Farrel