Re: [L3sm] [l3sm] #16 (draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model): Line card Diversity contraint augmentation suggestions
"Ogaki, Kenichi" <ke-oogaki@kddi.com> Fri, 02 September 2016 04:44 UTC
Return-Path: <ke-oogaki@kddi.com>
X-Original-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF2912B02F for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:44:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.769
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.769 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5XfXB10dVbeT for <l3sm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from post-send.kddi.com (athena3.kddi.com [27.90.165.196]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4085A12D539 for <l3sm@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LTMC2122.kddi.com (LTMC2122.kddi.com [10.206.0.63]) by post-send.kddi.com (KDDI Mail) with ESMTP id DD970E0069; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:44:43 +0900 (JST)
Received: from LTMC2144.kddi.com ([10.206.0.236] [10.206.0.236]) by LTMC2122.kddi.com with ESMTP; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:44:43 +0900
Received: from LTMC2144.kddi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.kddi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B763E4C0058; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:44:43 +0900 (JST)
Received: from LTMC2152.kddi.com (post-incheck [10.206.0.239]) by LTMC2144.kddi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3C94C0051; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:44:43 +0900 (JST)
Received: from LTMC2152.kddi.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by LTMC2152.kddi.com with ESMTP id u824ihFA017815; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:44:43 +0900
Received: from LTMC2152.kddi.com.mid_4039552 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by LTMC2152.kddi.com with ESMTP id u824YftN006088; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:34:42 +0900
X-SA-MID: 4039552
Received: from KDDI1508PC0003 ([10.200.122.178] [10.200.122.178]) by post-smtp2.kddi.com with ESMTPA; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:34:41 +0900
From: "Ogaki, Kenichi" <ke-oogaki@kddi.com>
To: jplandry@bell.ca
References: <056.2882b8754baed6a5c529e068c8e183b0@tools.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <056.2882b8754baed6a5c529e068c8e183b0@tools.ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 13:34:41 +0900
Message-ID: <01d701d204d3$529717d0$f7c54770$@kddi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQGXcb6FuMm9P42XT4Ih94AJjnykhaDavq2w
Content-Language: ja
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/l3sm/mc8UwH4SQ1_WJMWLMmgmeWtJstM>
Cc: l3sm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [L3sm] [l3sm] #16 (draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model): Line card Diversity contraint augmentation suggestions
X-BeenThere: l3sm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: L3VPN Service YANG Model discussion group <l3sm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/l3sm/>
List-Post: <mailto:l3sm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm>, <mailto:l3sm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 04:44:47 -0000
Hi, As same comment as issue#15, it is more limited use case that the CE is provider-managed and is a chassis-typed. I think PE linecard diversity can get the consensus as it's common deployment. However, chassis-typed managed CE is specific for particular service providers. Such a specific requirement should be solved by augmentation. All the best, Kenichi -----Original Message----- From: L3sm [mailto:l3sm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of l3sm issue tracker Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2016 5:20 AM To: draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model@tools.ietf.org; jplandry@bell.ca Cc: l3sm@ietf.org Subject: [L3sm] [l3sm] #16 (draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-model): Line card Diversity contraint augmentation suggestions #16: Line card Diversity contraint augmentation suggestions "linecard-diverse" diversity constraint does not state explicitly whether CE or PE line card diversity is required. Recommending to rename it to PE- linecard-diverse. Correspondingly a new CE-linecard-diverse constraint could be added to also offer this option for the CE. -- -------------------------------------+---------------------------------- -------------------------------------+--- Reporter: jplandry@bell.ca | Owner: draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn- Type: enhancement | service-model@tools.ietf.org Priority: minor | Status: new Component: draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn- | Milestone: service-model | Version: Severity: - | Keywords: -------------------------------------+---------------------------------- -------------------------------------+--- Ticket URL: <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/l3sm/trac/ticket/16> l3sm <https://tools.ietf.org/l3sm/> _______________________________________________ L3sm mailing list L3sm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/l3sm
- [L3sm] [l3sm] #16 (draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-service-… l3sm issue tracker
- Re: [L3sm] [l3sm] #16 (draft-ltsd-l3sm-l3vpn-serv… Ogaki, Kenichi