Re: Poll for adoption: draft-fang-l3vpn-end-system-requirements

[Loa Andersson <[e-mail]>]

Folks,

I read the draft and think it is a good start to address a real
problem.

I support making this a working group document.

There are some things that can be addressed during the normal
wg process, e.g. I would like to make the requirements easily 
identifiable (e.g. RFC 5654 number the requirements), 5654 also clearly
separate explanatory text and requirement text.

The structure of the document need to be reviewed, at least updating
the section numbering.

I think RFC 2119 needs to be a normative reference.

/Loa

On 2014-09-05 15:50, Thomas Morin wrote:
> Hello working group,
>
> This email starts a two-week poll on adopting
> draft-fang-l3vpn-end-system-requirements [1] as a working group item.
>
> Please send comments to the list and state if you support adoption or
> not (in the later case, please also state the reasons).
>
> This poll runs until **September 19th**.
>
>
> *Coincidentally*, we are also polling for knowledge of any IPR that
> applies to this draft, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in
> compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669
> and 5378 for more details).
>
> ==> *If you are listed as a document author or contributor* please
> respond to this email and indicate whether or not you are aware of any
> relevant IPR.
>
> The draft will not be adopted until a response has been received from
> each author and contributor.
>
> If you are on the L3VPN WG mailing list but are not listed as an author
> or contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Martin & Thomas
> l3vpn chairs
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fang-l3vpn-end-system-requirements-03
>

-- 


Loa Andersson                        email: [e-mail]
Senior MPLS Expert                          [e-mail]
Huawei Technologies (consultant)     phone: [phone]