IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lake] Static-DH-based Protocols for LAKE

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 23 October 2019 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4FE1207FF for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 04:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id STk2kLviH-li for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 04:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885EB12016E for <lake@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 04:40:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E493898D; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:38:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C5476D; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:40:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Karthikeyan Bhargavan <karthik.bhargavan@gmail.com>
cc: lake@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <948ECECE-5425-4720-A0BA-F1E918F9F8F9@gmail.com>
References: <E28DDCCB-7F3B-4CFD-898C-93A9A80B7184@gmail.com> <948ECECE-5425-4720-A0BA-F1E918F9F8F9@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 07:40:41 -0400
Message-ID: <22772.1571830841@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/0pKztMKsebG6Gklr9OjJP8Ygspc>
Subject: Re: [Lake] Static-DH-based Protocols for LAKE
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 11:40:46 -0000

Karthikeyan Bhargavan <karthik.bhargavan@gmail.com> wrote:
    > Some things are different:
    > - ID_CRED_V is used to retrieve g^v, the responder's static Diffie-Hellman key
    > - ID_CRED_U is used to retrieve g^u, the initiator's static Diffie-Hellman key

So these are either pre-exchanged, or they are sent (possibly out-of-band)
under some digital signature?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email