Re: [Lake] Lake charter call for comments

Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr> Tue, 10 September 2019 16:06 UTC

Return-Path: <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 414EE1201CE for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:06:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LU5wjhLvwdgk for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BCED120058 for <lake@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 09:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,490,1559512800"; d="scan'208";a="401119723"
Received: from wifi-pro-83-228.paris.inria.fr ([128.93.83.228]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Sep 2019 18:06:27 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Mališa Vučinić <malisa.vucinic@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20190904045654.GY58050@kduck.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:06:27 +0200
Cc: lake@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EDB39BC4-1893-4982-8BCF-5CECAE84F24A@inria.fr>
References: <20190904045654.GY58050@kduck.mit.edu>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/1DRqHLikgNvAjeNTrThwJrsGQzk>
Subject: Re: [Lake] Lake charter call for comments
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:06:31 -0000

Hi,

I support the proposed charter, it’s great to finally see progress on this topic.

Mališa

> On 4 Sep 2019, at 06:56, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Thanks to everyone for the feedback so far.  In the interest of moving from
> an informal post-BoF discussion to a more structured path forward, this
> message starts a two-week last call for comments and consensus on a LAKE
> charter.  I've tried to incorporate the feedback from Martin and Göran
> (though my editorial hand couldn't resist a few tweaks; all errors are
> mine), and my apologies to anyone whose comments I missed.  Depending on
> how discussion goes, additional revisions may be posted during the comment
> period to help achieve better clarity.  If we get good agreement here, then
> the charter can go to the IESG and IAB for the formal approval process
> (including IETF LC).  Please reply even you have no specific comments; the
> IESG and IAB need to be able to gauge the level of community support for
> and interest in the proposed work.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben
> 
> ==[ CHARTER ]==
> Problem
> 
> Constrained environments using OSCORE in network environments such as
> NB-IoT, 6TiSCH, and LoRaWAN need a ‘lightweight’ authenticated key
> exchange (LAKE) that enables forward security.  'Lightweight' refers to:
> 
>  * resource consumption, measured by number of round-trips to complete,
>    bytes on the wire, wall-clock time to complete, or power consumption
>  * the amount of new code required on end systems which already have an
>    OSCORE stack
> 
> Goals
> 
> This working group is intended to be a narrowly focused activity
> intended to produce at most one LAKE for OSCORE usage and close.
> 
> The working group will collaborate and coordinate with other IETF WGs
> such as ACE, CORE, 6TISCH, and LPWAN to understand and validate the
> requirements and solution.  draft-selander-ace-cose-ecdhe is a candidate
> starting point for the LAKE produced by the WG.  Any work available from
> the TLS WG that satisfies the determined requirements will also be
> evaluated for suitability.
> 
> Program of Work
> 
> The deliverables of this WG are:
> 
> 1. Design requirements of the lightweight authenticated key exchange
> protocol for OSCORE (this draft will not be published as an RFC but will be
> used to drive WG consensus on the deliverable (2)
> 
> 2. Specify a lightweight authenticated key exchange protocol suitable for
> use in constrained environments using OSCORE
> ==[ CHARTER ]==
> 
> -- 
> Lake mailing list
> Lake@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake