Re: [Lake] draft minutes of lake BoF
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 30 July 2019 17:49 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC5912019C for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:49:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nBxaVhRVo9ER for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70578120196 for <lake@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 10:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3455B3808A; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:49:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2659980; Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:49:54 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
cc: "lake@ietf.org" <lake@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <960921a0-5c94-0a39-5756-2b10b03f989e@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <960921a0-5c94-0a39-5756-2b10b03f989e@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:49:54 -0400
Message-ID: <28744.1564508994@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/AnD4Xg4nT21PvCHh2PPS6pfq6GU>
Subject: Re: [Lake] draft minutes of lake BoF
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 17:49:59 -0000
I am quoting as saying:
currentlibrary. [...] What we try to do is key OSCORE. Don't want to run CoAP
over DTLS, want to key OSCORE and let CoAP run. That's where transport agility
comes from, across layers[?]. For X, given cTLS, let's do that -- but for
things that go across several devices, please let's have EDHOC.
To explain the ?:
It's across different transport mechanisms (not layers).
CoAP/OSCORE can be transported across many things other than UDP, and if
we do the AKE at the CoAP layer (rather than outside/around as DTLS does),
then it is easier to get the properties we want.
[This is the premise of the ATLAS work too]
the next sentence probably should be redacted. I remember saying it, but I
can't remember what message I was trying to express about "X".
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [
] mcr@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails [
- [Lake] draft minutes of lake BoF Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Lake] draft minutes of lake BoF Michael Richardson
- Re: [Lake] draft minutes of lake BoF Stephen Farrell