IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lake] New paper: comparing EDHOC and DTLS 1.3

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 31 January 2024 11:16 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B88C18DB97 for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:16:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0ikse1KNBBfO for <lake@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:16:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12c.google.com (mail-lf1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17EDC1CAF39 for <lake@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:16:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-511206d1c89so1771608e87.1 for <lake@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:16:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1706699769; x=1707304569; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=sWtnNgRBmD/loXZJ4mSdhVAftKWLz05j8iuD29c0Gsw=; b=k9bvLqMCb1PR4JqTzQX4yfyPG63k5jZmDILwjF+Cy8uomzMVli9DUX23pcXKXYeyPf VEbHNAAgK+8dSjjyK+n9F+VlPrIcMCKiq5dT/2x9nVXLXolZP33NfvhDJDd445QRnP7k XmIt7CgeksggorWB6m3YVnc+ZzdGpOLe7lqXixleRUBarrzKjpCQd40Gpjz2IvSIuZEL AXGyJUF6x4MceAEN9VDAuO+mMMqRs/YhlbLSAKT63FCmdsw8E7ojaETHwBtQxSyUBEe1 I615zQVCYP/OwHDycCcNTxN4f0vSkOQm6kGDb2C8zRU3f0Pgzp/dB/1Cp+hJD22Z0Y9e Ji5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1706699769; x=1707304569; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=sWtnNgRBmD/loXZJ4mSdhVAftKWLz05j8iuD29c0Gsw=; b=qYfy0U0SXPIzhlTGyVuQhdGSlQQfYfdP0t0d75Uln+Nqwi75p+1+n+Eisl6SrR2RLk E+LyAPsBfB3yHkb+i5S4Xn4diRW/DNWPEOvo+zxgV3/we3Wy8DEPLi0V1wXVIaHlfxv0 ZnQyMpivu1DuqmGh3m7/QISaG+Ye2MOf/j05iiQGWOnunhbn6JTFNtpA2l0eOmi9rbbK 5VjsF5Uo8+FNFRg1Cb0SC75OEwKSrPi1l7nvvcPvzzatZUCvw3pUBs9fBjsS2ihvgpfd AXFR0ibmwoHUTwCISTQMoVORdyvoUMpB7NMc7FsDZIz0e1Eo8s9Ftvs0+IhGTiFtIcOA GzjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzTuwEji5jTCiPjKa66U7YDahRZnOJMhckU29T7nt7ythnKRn6q ahkUKWFz+oBPxwwjgYTj4lV+v6in/u8eD00SM77gptJ7NbrqPd+Td3FjYdk4nLY6TWUUU8DVTev hGPTAeHoltba5wqgDYDS4jImDSvs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEA4s0kLF+WSiIaEQebVwWYvBGY5MP/yD3JVzIGazzDCuCyB4xF7EiW/pX2fmqbILlekNzH0HG2ZFm9X0SiK68=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b546:0:b0:2cd:5cb3:d7b9 with SMTP id a6-20020a2eb546000000b002cd5cb3d7b9mr801316ljn.3.1706699768279; Wed, 31 Jan 2024 03:16:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1905409273.1079226.1706691818173.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr>
In-Reply-To: <1905409273.1079226.1706691818173.JavaMail.zimbra@inria.fr>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 06:15:31 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH7ry9pQ_vPBrAP7zGaKNHQWxqGhXEPjf-+mrKQa2r7-7w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Geovane Fedrecheski <geovane.fedrecheski@inria.fr>
Cc: lake@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006d35ef06103c0181"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/Fj-RVbbrePCqio4SaOyWaLXF1Ec>
Subject: Re: [Lake] New paper: comparing EDHOC and DTLS 1.3
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:16:15 -0000

Impressive results! Thank you for sharing your work.

Best regards,
Kathleen

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 4:03 AM Geovane Fedrecheski <
geovane.fedrecheski@inria.fr> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I would like to disseminate a newly accepted publication [1] on the
> subject of EDHOC. It is entitled "Performance Comparison of EDHOC and DTLS
> 1.3 in Internet-of-Things Environments" and will be presented this April at
> the WCNC 2024 [2].
>
> We evaluate how the reduction in message size of EDHOC vs. DTLS correlates
> with the usage of other scarce resources in IoT environments: time, energy,
> and memory.
> Results show that EDHOC achieves ×6 to ×14 reduction in packet sizes,
> ×1.44 improvement in handshake duration and ×2.79 reduction in energy
> consumed (Cortex-M4 devices communicating via IEEE 802.15.4 radios). Also,
> flash memory and RAM showed a ×4 improvement (WolfSSL vs. lakers [3]).
> For more details and results (including a LoRaWAN time-on-air simulation),
> feel free to check the full manuscript at https://hal.science/hal-04382397
> .
>
> Regards,
> Geovane Fedrecheski
>
> [1] https://hal.science/hal-04382397
> [2] https://wcnc2024.ieee-wcnc.org/
> [3] https://github.com/openwsn-berkeley/lakers
> --
> Lake mailing list
> Lake@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email