IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Lake] Standards Action with Expert Review (Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Tue, 22 August 2023 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: lake@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0E8C151065; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 01:49:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0mPKlNYhXKma; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 01:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400::25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D983C14CEFF; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 01:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 9D86580923; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:49:07 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1692694148; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to:references; bh=y7ZhXGdjLXTPIAQ/9m0sUE6wqWaZrM7FHkjEotn4rp8=; b=GSKjKfotrajx78JOsbUa2LWvTuAvACRwpTy/9hUdlY/KT5WCvWuaOXAKvu6Wy+0554ag46 m/hfgGmic2f2VnUGhBTWI1+SGAzdGERj5LkXUW7+xmICZrUNC/uZYCOD+NK9/thPYkd8Wp L0vOOIyEtTeqC3E/Qy2R4fFx70tg+Ioctkav0RYOThnk+zYII0GXjyVNwAsQdMcLEFk8Bd sRM91zOGT0nP9SgHVc8T60dOJkJW6tRZIVZ23/QqLLGbu+3v9/nmIPhf0N6GF+Zjry50xb 1gJvGBI35i/unTnjlK+UQjwlfSVecnWtQU229wEKyHLCb5cGkPITn7FY4Sc4jg==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_890B5532-83C0-4AF1-B095-706AC25DA748"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
In-Reply-To: <70BC5E9D-2FDD-4CA1-866D-385FF8D403D7@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 11:49:07 +0300
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-lake-edhoc@ietf.org, lake-chairs@ietf.org, lake@ietf.org, malisa.vucinic@inria.fr
Message-Id: <ACF4B182-7B66-45ED-AAB1-04C3D4513F29@eggert.org>
References: <169269257169.1146.6134251465161445844@ietfa.amsl.com> <70BC5E9D-2FDD-4CA1-866D-385FF8D403D7@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.2
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lake/rmy2vvg2KAcXFtf3MP3JxRnDsdE>
Subject: Re: [Lake] Standards Action with Expert Review (Re: Lars Eggert's Discuss on draft-ietf-lake-edhoc-20: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT))
X-BeenThere: lake@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Lightweight Authenticated Key Exchange <lake.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/lake/>
List-Post: <mailto:lake@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lake>, <mailto:lake-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 08:49:15 -0000

Hi,

On Aug 22, 2023, at 11:42, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> I seem to remember that we had IANA registrations made by Standards Action where none of the authors, IESG members, or other reviewers were aware of a specific detail in the registration requirements.

do you have details? Given that it was a Standards Action, I'm surprised if authors and the IESG were not ware of something, given that they author and review the I-D (in addition to a Last Call).

> Do we now have processes in place that would automatically involve a registry expert in a Standards Action?

No. The theory was/is that IETF Last Call and IESG Review provide more review than Expert Review does, so it seems redundant. If nat belief is no longer held, we should update the relevant process.

Thanks,
Lars

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email