IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] [core] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-09

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Wed, 13 January 2021 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8E03A1165 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:44:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0hkTibNwDFiS for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:44:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.smeinc.net (mail.smeinc.net [209.135.209.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B1E3A1167 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:44:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98C5300BCF for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:35:09 -0500 (EST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.smeinc.net
Received: from mail.smeinc.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.smeinc.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 2y5SpHeyZzIV for <last-call@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:35:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from a860b60074bd.fios-router.home (pool-141-156-161-153.washdc.fios.verizon.net [141.156.161.153]) by mail.smeinc.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39E40300B66; Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:35:07 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.17\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <48D2C104-FA28-41BF-8873-D5DE8AD5BBD2@tzi.org>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:35:08 -0500
Cc: "iot-directorate@ietf.org" <iot-directorate@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org, "core@ietf.org WG (core@ietf.org)" <core@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-core-dev-urn.all@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <02E3F1AD-47EA-4CC5-825F-58D75E0DAE13@vigilsec.com>
References: <160996930502.21827.5533521556349871834@ietfa.amsl.com> <B091AE313126430286B0902C@PSB> <959CAC2A-A973-4302-842F-5A2955378F99@piuha.net> <D8003464FF064C592F73FB65@PSB> <68B8D07F-6B14-40F8-8F02-5BF794D4B118@piuha.net> <48D2C104-FA28-41BF-8873-D5DE8AD5BBD2@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.17)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/-SHPU2KSUIo_pegjwNERAor7O_U>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [core] Iotdir telechat review of draft-ietf-core-dev-urn-09
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:44:31 -0000

https://tools.ietf.org/tools/bap/abnf.cgi

It seems to work properly if the space is dropped after the %s.

Russ

> On Jan 13, 2021, at 4:39 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> One nit on -10:
> I don’t believe RFC 7405 allows whitespace after %s.
> 
> (The version of bap that I’m using doesn’t support RFC 7405 yet, so I can’t easily validate this belief.)
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
> 
> -- 
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status