IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14

"Ganga, Ilango S" <ilango.s.ganga@intel.com> Fri, 15 November 2019 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <ilango.s.ganga@intel.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D78712010E; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:56:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a1ovigjky32v; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:56:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC832120131; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:56:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message)
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Nov 2019 17:56:36 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.68,306,1569308400"; d="scan'208";a="288418805"
Received: from orsmsx107.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.22.240.5]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2019 17:56:36 -0800
Received: from orsmsx116.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.7.11]) by ORSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.224]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 17:56:36 -0800
From: "Ganga, Ilango S" <ilango.s.ganga@intel.com>
To: Scott Bradner <sob@sobco.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "nvo3@ietf.org" <nvo3@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14
Thread-Index: AQHVlBXaKY5hbZW4AkOX0dKTBTIEdKeLhW1w
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 01:56:36 +0000
Message-ID: <C5A274B25007804B800CB5B289727E3590670B19@ORSMSX116.amr.corp.intel.com>
References: <157298496055.4506.2657073610798133355@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157298496055.4506.2657073610798133355@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNTc1NzE1M2UtNzU3Yi00NDQ0LThhY2YtMWVlNDJjOTlkMGRlIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoiUnNPdnV0a2prazRHTHZPckhzUUlkR0hGWHZ6UTBIamtqaXNhUms1WFR3cjYrUnZBOE04aHFnU21XNWtFalA2ViJ9
x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.2.0.6
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [10.22.254.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/2LDCCqOQqx1xvnLoyheRN0-612Q>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 01:56:44 -0000

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your review. Please see the response below. 

Regards,
Ilango Ganga
Geneve Editor

-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Bradner via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> 
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2019 12:16 PM
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org; nvo3@ietf.org; draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve.all@ietf.org
Subject: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-14

Reviewer: Scott Bradner
Review result: Ready

This is an OPS-DIR review of Geneve: Generic Network Virtualization Encapsulation This ID proposes a new control plane agnostic tunneling protocol primarily for network virtualization related applications.

While the document does not have a specific operational considerations section it is a very well written document that clearly explains the issues with and features of the proposal which includes most of the operations related considerations. I did not see any such issues that the document did not already deal with.

I do have one question – why, in section 4.3.1 (5) is this not a MUST
      <Response> We have followed the same precedence as other UDP encapsulation protocols RFC 8086 and RFC 7510 in defining this requirement. </>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email