Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-foudil-securitytxt-08.txt> (A Method for Web Security Policies) to Informational RFC

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 11 December 2019 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE42B12000F; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:03:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gQQIlpQLiNYl; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5ED2120129; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1if5OM-0004MW-1s; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 17:03:14 +0000
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:03:10 -0800
Message-ID: <m2lfrix0a9.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com" <Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>, "draft-foudil-securitytxt@ietf.org" <draft-foudil-securitytxt@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1912111008230.17737@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <157591314890.2123.12378772921757205119.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1AEC1FDE-252D-4B3C-BAC8-3AECA969541F@akamai.com> <20191211104023.GA29854@nic.fr> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1912111008230.17737@bofh.nohats.ca>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.2 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/6enEDF5TEM-o2LGdFgOD5CjjTsY>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: <draft-foudil-securitytxt-08.txt> (A Method for Web Security Policies) to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 17:03:19 -0000

> this proposal is not a good idea at all. It just provides more places
> with more non-standard types of unverified, obsolete or malicious
> information that are especially untrustworthy when needing to report a
> compromise. The information simply can never really be trusted.

agree.  pushing back against this untrustable, though well intentioned,
hack yet again.  paul says it all.

randy