[Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-cms-kemri-07

Sean Turner via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 01 February 2024 18:57 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Sean Turner via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-lamps-cms-kemri.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, spasm@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <170681387161.60132.428112342901225607@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Sean Turner <sean+ietf@sn3rd.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 10:57:51 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/77qb-mvzIYzoyPN3IKrrn6qr8XE>
Subject: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-cms-kemri-07

Reviewer: Sean Turner
Review result: Ready with Nits

I-D Nits complains that the introduction and abstract should indicate that this
I-D updates RFC 5652.

Yeah this is a nit:

In s2, should this:
The originator establishes the CEK using these steps:
be replaced by this:
The originator establishes the CEK (or CAEK) using these steps:
because the processing overview addresses both (see s1).
Actually do the "or CEAK" in the rest of the section too? See:
https://github.com/lamps-wg/cms-kemri/pull/11

[Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf… Sean Turner via Datatracker