Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz> Fri, 14 May 2021 12:42 UTC
Return-Path: <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319CA3A180F; Fri, 14 May 2021 05:42:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UikFj0NIXjtd; Fri, 14 May 2021 05:42:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.nic.cz (mail.nic.cz [217.31.204.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56253A318D; Fri, 14 May 2021 05:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:5e0:29:ffff:fc73:fa64:57e6:2115]) by mail.nic.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BC90140AF4; Fri, 14 May 2021 14:42:11 +0200 (CEST)
From: Ladislav Lhotka <ladislav.lhotka@nic.cz>
To: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>, secdir@ietf.org
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <162097908855.2706.8929577886925875788@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <162097908855.2706.8929577886925875788@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 14:42:10 +0200
Message-ID: <87zgwxlc65.fsf@nic.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.2 at mail
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/XNvmbIYs9j1_DVq2Ufb0_THOH1E>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:42:25 -0000
Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> writes: > Reviewer: Valery Smyslov > Review result: Ready > > I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's > ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the > IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the > security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat > these comments just like any other last call comments. > > The document defines how IANA assigned values in two DNS registries > (DNS CLASSes and Resource Record TYPEs) are to be translated into > YANG enumerations, so that they can be later used in defining > YANG modules modelling DNS configuration. > > The document introduces no new technology or protocol > and only defines a one-to-one translation of IANA assigned values > to YANG enumerations. > > Nits: > I think that RFC 8174 should also be referenced (along with RFC 2119). > Updated, thanks. Lada > -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
- [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf… Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-… Ladislav Lhotka