[Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-10
Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 09 September 2024 17:54 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietf.org
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from [10.244.2.118] (unknown [104.131.183.230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EC6C14F5E5; Mon, 9 Sep 2024 10:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Sparks via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: art@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 12.23.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <172590444170.2719609.11032444803795963043@dt-datatracker-68b7b78cf9-q8rsp>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2024 10:54:01 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: GMEIJRCJ5ZV27BUG62KUER5PROMUXLEZ
X-Message-ID-Hash: GMEIJRCJ5ZV27BUG62KUER5PROMUXLEZ
X-MailFrom: noreply@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth.all@ietf.org, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Reply-To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Subject: [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-unprompted-auth-10
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/XNwdeTnbmAV6vBMg9LczKXzgEwA>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:last-call-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:last-call-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:last-call-leave@ietf.org>
Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready for publication as a proposed standard RFC I had one question, even though I think the document is fine as is: Is there any need to version this, or if there was a need for a significant change to how it works, would you just shift to a different authentication scheme? RjS
- [Last-Call] Artart last call review of draft-ietf… Robert Sparks via Datatracker
- [Last-Call] Re: Artart last call review of draft-… David Schinazi