IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Post approval change on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra

Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net> Mon, 21 September 2020 13:59 UTC

Return-Path: <01000174b0f5e772-3209a6e8-b5a0-4dee-89c2-9dda770b1bfe-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996773A0407 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:59:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RCZJpms5PRK9 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a8-31.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a8-31.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.8.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C9A23A03FC for <last-call@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 06:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1600696739; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=w72a6uvlEpiLGcGaqX63vdXSf+r0ZbRrivEIohRCvO0=; b=Xj0Io45yyKeqH44R0GXLTjJPum01M8LIN3zfIXVdtryML+tTCNwvzk6daZ7mDSDd 8VNjuavjhoL9EAYmylpC19iFL+yUVp62M1rzDNUtpeC1PVioFBk0v8tTVidBc79Iv8b DUsJ/gQ8BqgP78+R7x0arntKxXtTDUvPt8BZA1bs=
From: Kent Watsen <kent@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <01000174b0f5e772-3209a6e8-b5a0-4dee-89c2-9dda770b1bfe-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6058BE0E-31D8-4C0F-96AC-9344CF7122E9"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:58:59 +0000
In-Reply-To: <15446.1600268896@localhost>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
References: <CAHw9_iK85gYnPYt4y6qzvYnbXgOD8W88UZ9t_TaP=_M9kvvCjA@mail.gmail.com> <15446.1600268896@localhost>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2020.09.21-54.240.8.31
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ZiXqAeqE8r6gw_aOLfAgQP3x6zE>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Post approval change on draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:59:03 -0000

FWIW, an equally-good (I think) alternative to hardcoding a .well-known mount point is to use the existing “host-meta” document, as RESTCONF describes here: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8040#section-3.1 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8040#section-3.1>.

K.


> On Sep 16, 2020, at 11:08 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> 
> Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
>> having to assume EST. Therefore the above BRSKI diff (and BRSKI-AE) propose
>> to introduce a /.well-known/brski registry.
> 
> I believe that I ran the text by Mark, who I believe is the /.well-known
> expert reviewer.  I believe that he said that it looked good, but it would be
> great if Mark could confirm that I got it right.
> 
>>> Dear ANIMA WG
>>> 
>>> This email starts a 2 week call for consensus to modify draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra
>>> such that new well-known URIs introduced by BRSKI will use a /.well-known/brski
>>> prefix instead of the pre-existing /.well-known/est prefix.
>>> 
>>> The proposed change can be seen at the following rfcdiff URL:
>>> 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-43&url2=draft-richardson-anima-brski-renamed-00
>>> 
>>> This consensus call will end on September 14, 23:59 UTC
>>> This consensus call is ONLY for said change and not for any other aspects of BRSKI.
> 
> Existing implementers have agreed to the change.
> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email