IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Last-Call] Your Discuss on draft-crocker-inreply-react

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Fri, 12 March 2021 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C743A0AAF for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:39:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bbiw.net header.b=qFhN0VPe; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Gh3cj2ML
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SFWQHyXmUEOV for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:39:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A7C73A0AA7 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:39:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2FF1AE3; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:39:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:39:01 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbiw.net; h=to :cc:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=kFu4+rYxqgoEHZjNjEajQuqPul OFlVbsCixmBjaLMOA=; b=qFhN0VPef1d+6oPDXVHJtzSg/+BNTgIhhuhutL2d9p uOnBt9FzrsNxUESDj/wqfEqrc3g/DcdvNiJpEw7CepLgIhbklEs/T58Y97fj0TFJ gVR68n0mqp2raaTbK5r0vC7O9EHpDygbehGJs81wSos+6VHCJnquyreaeTJtF5zm c7TrNIqcyQhjPCuy/nIOuW2xjw0f2CTl6ghnl2jNH1FPgcdm0TAFFsi1pcACbmIo ryJvRnTWaL6tNktwfryt7+BMYGKzcF0y0HXY/Yc0LanF0YSalFXrgsNx1CnrKqk/ GJy37fPEtvGVbMMvZDhdXWmF9Y8kkSqfvVWl42bZyvCw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=kFu4+r YxqgoEHZjNjEajQuqPulOFlVbsCixmBjaLMOA=; b=Gh3cj2ML+4cPUFTprN5rB6 p6GVTFw1QJUSHWkyA2NdHVMu7s26olquiuKWoX4agCKnddLMnlKr0sEtW2M3yaWj rrBCPqVD3L94Lgs9W+dvEHyU0cpzNxRSiJyOygXHCiutzgZ840hph3ZYtzZ+at48 wKnX/5/eTz0eSsUAXa1p3Yx82G9zKXdhPvNIejgfoZv5GjYlkubt7ZOIS+BazrjM q//u86OgWUKwSVOf2MFqKiOR/KOmSzlhbAaClccCQeyC8f549A6h+A5Bt2thMiSN wUOsbLlpxaXovEsSWa9458TY9FECJvrfZCjIJNH9M+tH7HImQNazogZ63wohfMxg ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:VMNLYBHeLDp-Vm5tX6W6D2NocvFF6ogpK2FoHixUwFAJxiRUcM1-nw> <xme:VMNLYGXvP9Ile3Ro6df7jMoS--KrQDPMUAzDKzyVIWUZyajZj9nwsEZvKnNUX1K8G sfKMm5HTomq2i86eA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddvvddguddviecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefvhffuohfkffgfgggtgfesthejredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgv ucevrhhotghkvghruceouggtrhhotghkvghrsegssghifidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhepudehtdeggffhveetteeigeejteduhfethfeutdefgfetgeetgefhheehffek gfeunecuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghdpsggsihifrdhnvghtnecukfhppedutd ekrddvvdeirdduiedvrdeifeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhep mhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegutghrohgtkhgvrhessggsihifrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:VMNLYDIEyjTiqdh__w7-Tf0lZaPKdYE2cIapkau0K8yPzOlPzHh2Mg> <xmx:VMNLYHEhxHjVo6RQ5qTjTj1CIkwGu1mN6sVCrNJWUfhjgq5ZNr3sxg> <xmx:VMNLYHWH_a-4TgKq86C6kIozROBl0YaKb3UHnrxjZwbaWSUZGcvYOw> <xmx:VcNLYODJSpQ9MlVwjfZvc93RUhMbXVm_kBk8W_lAn8IFdFyLcp3bEQ>
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2D645240065; Fri, 12 Mar 2021 14:39:00 -0500 (EST)
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <a107500e-3c5d-c12c-5f47-f98813bff2f7@bbiw.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:38:59 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/c2CwA6pC4Q3_7gtN3PrUtXVi5S8>
Subject: [Last-Call] Your Discuss on draft-crocker-inreply-react
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:39:04 -0000

Now that IETF Week is over...


The concern you expressed in your Discuss on draft-crocker-inreply-react:

> Discuss (2021-02-24 for -08)
> 
> I thought you were going to clean up whether the Content-Disposition was
> "React" or "Reaction" based on the gen-art review, but the document still seems
> internally inconsistent about it.
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/zun860KMrKdwqyKSWbrvWSPMuYM/
> indicates that "React" was the intent, but Sections 2 and 4.1 still use
> "Reaction", while the IANA Considerations register "React".  Section 3
> uses lowercase "reaction" in the context of a "Content-Disposition"
> header field as well.  Section 7 mentions a "Reaction capability".

was resolved some version(s) ago.


If you still have a concern about the draft's use of its label, please 
let me know.  Otherwise it would be nice to let the draft finally 
profess to the RFC Editor.


Thanks.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email