IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] [pim] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-07.txt> (A Yang Data Model for IGMP/MLD Proxy) to Proposed Standard

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 28 October 2022 10:49 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6A3C14CF1C; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 03:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18wJE001yHp1; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 03:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 665C1C14CF08; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 03:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id j7so722225pjn.5; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 03:49:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7W7hmPjz8wWyPyCoigwC2qhYRqeDRaB/ippvV3NlZj4=; b=LN+V+RQ8sGWSIc90vyYYri63MH1R3jWzzhpTVJgt8UqmfDjcH9o0F5gzsfthyr1fQ9 iAFO6jnEUJb+A63Nv8WkDZzQc9Y9Nprs7fWJ/kb2Lp9/QhgZCTistlpG1KE4D0f8VztW AjHFdKeHJu7JCrbfFER0YYCPIdI1vf4nksIwRAcWuLec8xGr7WV0WMVPt3m5uV/Udnz6 a+i5jYyy5TaT6rHMz29uHJ4vgRkYTvIm+zktgOSc+lx0ZMlA17kWFrjWbLD4PRdbWBhj Hl18ekbdNKLo5qnUSkS1ou9wH5JnIhjVIQyQ5AmETTNzvVHK8Cgo7p8cpPN0Jvor1QT1 HjDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7W7hmPjz8wWyPyCoigwC2qhYRqeDRaB/ippvV3NlZj4=; b=nJmfEHQZazca93xu9XlJTXVe7tgrVteiJOBda1nBLGno6xqKfcKetqK+o6sqDkqZvW 8wE1KsiXqsyomkg5UxsDEDxojU/HVE8RtlLuT86wiw8aITjj+Jai2zhnvNWlDQ8lzRMg p4imL8DV8b9Dp+VNMfRerz6u1VUzgnPZZd4AWWlsW8T0LVpTt8XC0PTbqRsz8IMaqtP/ lVeoiE0V9LC06EnVfFNBYfVvKAmUFCWg6HCOSAa91QiRfQ7EPS6iw9lgfu9W91l2TTNg LCUlMc52HR88jFEotabPL45kH7q7S1Xw4qdfVTNd8qU2txt/Zf+EBwhljf+JLnPgfqOs Rx7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2jLFtyASXlu5Kj54/Ue0mby1/xWWJ/pvwAyGUGOLkOCRZNjXYb euLg5q4VxAJHscgr41gngcvCejFYK3j9iYrHAPM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM6o95ydw4nmmWdgdtBgrY8qOlFlxW4hjKt31wSeP9Tk+5bRxH/ysO3nL2646hPp7ow3lwuwXE1cDoB7HW3Jrgg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1250:b0:185:40c6:3c2c with SMTP id u16-20020a170903125000b0018540c63c2cmr54502958plh.64.1666954161948; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 03:49:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 03:49:21 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <635B94A1.1080509@btconnect.com>
References: <166672603351.21794.9905339434105987766@ietfa.amsl.com> <635A71F4.7080104@btconnect.com> <AS2PR07MB8979EDD24A3DB195463BC88F96329@AS2PR07MB8979.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <635B94A1.1080509@btconnect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 03:49:21 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESswLAr_zbMSdYwKNJNdNEAQcnATFccWO8NKe1xK7i5xqBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom petch <daedulus@btconnect.com>, Hongji Zhao <hongji.zhao@ericsson.com>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>
Cc: "pim@ietf.org" <pim@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang@ietf.org>, "pim-chairs@ietf.org" <pim-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/dmh7parEUhZUKV0rBBBrO8dsk54>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] [pim] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pim-igmp-mld-proxy-yang-07.txt> (A Yang Data Model for IGMP/MLD Proxy) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 10:49:22 -0000

On October 28, 2022 at 4:37:41 AM, tom petch wrote:
> On 28/10/2022 07:31, Hongji Zhao wrote:


Hi!

> > The last submission time for the I-D submission was 2022-10-24 23:59 UTC,
> > so I couldn't update the draft now. I will update it as long as I-D
> > submission is available.
>
> You might want to wait until the end of Last Call so that all comments
> are made against the same version, even if the same comments are made
> more than once. Some ADs like this approach, others like the I-D to be
> updated as it goes.

Waiting until the window opens is fine.


> I do not know what the answer is for addresses in IPv4 examples, short
> of writing an I-D to ask IANA to assign a block (when the submission
> window opens:-). This is not an issue for most WG but seems to be so
> here. I see other uses of 225. but think that wrong.

Please take a look at rfc6676 (Multicast Addresses for Documentation).


Thanks!

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email