[Last-Call] Opsdir last call partial review of draft-boydseda-ipfix-psamp-bulk-data-yang-model-02
Joe Clarke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 20 December 2019 18:23 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietf.org
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B736712087D; Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:23:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Joe Clarke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, draft-boydseda-ipfix-psamp-bulk-data-yang-model.all@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.113.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <157686621669.5042.12598226466109750134@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 10:23:36 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/h7iBcvXLqT3GC_k1shGm9ZQ39ao>
Subject: [Last-Call] Opsdir last call partial review of draft-boydseda-ipfix-psamp-bulk-data-yang-model-02
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 18:23:37 -0000
Review is partially done. Another assignment may be needed to complete it. Reviewer: Joe Clarke Review result: Not Ready I have been assigned as a secondary reviewer on behalf of the ops directorate to review this draft. This draft defines YANG modules for PSAMP with bulk export via IPFIX. It contends that RFC 6728 defines a single YANG module that couples IPFIX export with PSAMP sampling. It also puts an overly onerous requirement that a device support SCTP. The aim of this draft is to decouple the sampling and exporting and allow for other export transports. I think Mehmet raised some valid points in his review around why this is being done as an AD-sponsored document. While I am not a PSAMP/IPFIX expert, the document and approach seem reasonable to me, and I wonder why this wasn't discussed more in opsawg as a replacement for 6728. I also agree with Mehmet that the 6728 authors should be included on this for a deeper technical review. One other point that struck me as I read this document was that 6728 is being obsoleted by this, but there are references to things defined within it. I would think that anything that this new document will use in a normative fashion should be explicitly stated in this document. Such examples are found in Section 3 where text like "based on [RFC6728]" is used.
- [Last-Call] Opsdir last call partial review of dr… Joe Clarke via Datatracker