[Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04

Brian Trammell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 03 October 2022 08:38 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietf.org
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C73C1522AC; Mon, 3 Oct 2022 01:38:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Trammell via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: <tsv-art@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs.all@ietf.org, ipsec@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 8.17.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <166478633713.57946.5340622612370532964@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 01:38:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/nezhLT37wfR0XJmdApb6bCm-JDg>
Subject: [Last-Call] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-mib-iptfs-04
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2022 08:38:57 -0000

Reviewer: Brian Trammell
Review result: Ready

This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's
ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written
primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's
authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF
discussion list for information.

When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this
review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC
tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review.

This document presents no transport-relevant issues not already considered
in its parent document (draft-ietf-ipsecme-iptfs); that document (and its ART
reviews) are more critical for the transport considerations of the deployment
of this protocol and its associated MIB.

This document, on its own, is ready for publication.

While a TSVART reviewer should always be skeptical of 
anything that looks like a switch to turn off congestion control
(1.3.6.1.3.500.1.1.1.2), the default (True) is appropriate, and the 
description points to guidance about how CC should be implemented.
The choice of RFC 5348 is conservative, but appropriate for this
application. 

Thanks, cheers,

Brian