Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-12
Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com> Tue, 09 June 2020 00:37 UTC
Return-Path: <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC4C3A082C; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 17:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=futurewei.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nCtNB0eZQ4yD; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 17:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn7nam10on2090.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.92.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 970403A0825; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 17:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=T/oAhxF0TmBKe+j6FKjvhaa2cIzX5ysqRAzI4FUdHxfa9UwnNLxQf5vpuSbJuupe7dKy5y72wA0CcYzGgYDX4GeKpcRR5VQGE1fzl5b7amb/n5xt3m/9cnSTqpJDC8N1huCNsKoDPfqSUVBI9uhBVvHYVUBTofJbK+CSYMmBhBGWanyf+AdkolaPPkB8HSXDoiCJ4u5+kNDPlqdXZr36ioU879TpOl6ct5M8e1XWIb8gzLCizNxqLyuXlNebJzp0Tc40/zT5yheE+FpzD41JS4JEXmSrliku/XFEYX04TGLtBFIcSJzdok3azcEq87WBn7FKbFPJq+1J7lgY2QlrOQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=C/afIsKbC5O7xL4DsIuBzasDoVayW4eTzrmcBCBGms0=; b=gFFojHaq+k381nuMeCHdpC2Q1Q6Evet6sU4E8O3PVwTBWczPADg+w229CgaAQESB/FdKxsQJe7YdwOHUgP2twACYSqLwqkrrvg9ZfiB6wEsfH6IceM7qKdLA5Za/AOZyJHpat0NzZ0H4e7BCf4FZ+kkUKmCu9gAM/YMlxEnht2/2WKVvN15cTYA8OS9OwDbAhOi4uDytQawNveFX79fVJEdjkmqv6sPPAzHUXOUqlKXnFKnXnsAwpg7GxTKN/Hgma9B1MsZ8lRywfCxzFKjop8aMqMwx+AP3HTFfN6FJjJAseflPiIi8H9yyiiw2Ts1xO7KGANr3EwN4UI0GJDnuhQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=futurewei.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=futurewei.com; dkim=pass header.d=futurewei.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=Futurewei.com; s=selector2; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=C/afIsKbC5O7xL4DsIuBzasDoVayW4eTzrmcBCBGms0=; b=QVUUW+/aAiqEdlSfK8DpCnWS9YoXCbVD7bYLQYoWNeHAl46C+iA7I/417Irbz4xAPjBZ+VTqy/3PqyTZM6EWc3w2fDoTYMjeScRCFh9s9Ep6nh4BMvLaLDPDa+LnIHbPBxJL75xXYI8wHD23q1POVdCiqJS2J5/2G90fyhPhCPY=
Received: from SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:805:55::16) by SA0PR13MB4063.namprd13.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:94::9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3088.9; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:37:06 +0000
Received: from SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::783f:2d78:2f9f:3116]) by SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::783f:2d78:2f9f:3116%7]) with mapi id 15.20.3088.016; Tue, 9 Jun 2020 00:37:06 +0000
From: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
CC: "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "lsr@ietf.org" <lsr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-12
Thread-Index: AQHWNacIWJAg6GKH30+LiVvpyzcZCai/JNgAgAADX4CABL8bEIAACRWAgAt98qA=
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:37:05 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR13MB2334A52B86871EDE9D04C54885820@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
References: <159068537978.29606.17882487660677527802@ietfa.amsl.com> <be900a0e-2f9f-e9f9-ad87-63121ae9703c@cisco.com> <SN6PR13MB2334975577CB640D7812E816858F0@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <dffb293d-2b95-9e89-eba3-567de72b8ae0@cisco.com> <SN6PR13MB23347E70A4C0DDA9BBA2E618858A0@SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <23b697ab-b773-b781-5e84-15c64f008907@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <23b697ab-b773-b781-5e84-15c64f008907@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: cisco.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;cisco.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=futurewei.com;
x-originating-ip: [72.180.73.64]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 8a901b8d-c04c-40f3-9867-08d80c0d3c7e
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SA0PR13MB4063:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SA0PR13MB4063FDAAAA65BD9888DFF5CC85820@SA0PR13MB4063.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 042957ACD7
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 2HGdvoLG+u8hmG27RrUda62iNBXHvN9b2UVNvCjrWPjvypo6fpANVBQ5DnViZ5bLEcFYf7a0Jw5UghpSVbtLm0Js8uA8SajJEA6YZd27F26o0jGjU8JlBLLj1IR+JOovICPCSudc7v9lnNK5bJz9d4/pRgOtyT03vq9B61GMkgoqzMGFFbPiq5W4PYfMFa0tpakSIOcYHVnDbvUiQV/gogdAWreS96W29EpX5nGBxf/z9xDhZAc6evpbUf90j+cJ0SNsxaSrdS/om58n8lDwMKfT6lpHEL0cJECHKwVEXdzFj3sgCIm2FiLnkE9evqQKFtEOWp5+Y33BjC1aAyaXoRGRfsgqADlE6Tzysh5dTgw72FP1SJACUjOBr+PaSEs56T5sKSp8/DzFFxEqGvPkIw==
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SN6PR13MB2334.namprd13.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFTY:; SFS:(4636009)(346002)(376002)(366004)(136003)(396003)(39850400004)(44832011)(66946007)(33656002)(5660300002)(76116006)(66476007)(66446008)(66556008)(316002)(52536014)(71200400001)(8676002)(64756008)(8936002)(110136005)(83380400001)(478600001)(53546011)(186003)(7696005)(55016002)(2906002)(26005)(54906003)(6506007)(86362001)(9686003)(66574014)(4326008); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: Rrjn6UH+HjLF5uU+DDNEmqrYtoWaF/lH4wuvpe2ATd6/sPRv+RWbSHfdNWP1gKLLpNI7s/SGIdOZE1dOmAgRUFwlNpq8gcr8P4yGxWPy1f6vtV1Df0QgYLheGM3Q6zInxGIJ15lZo7BmYrkObdWK4PB2mCx1Cny2SGEgIf21JwzDK23zcBsfOlFYDX1s4Kr6WTUgwMDRzLEwpUmQbyt16MjaXUbMGc7fbX+kERIA0tshqjsGFR5dVjqhlXqzfll3P5on+VNSDiDCx+1xTAEr5kK+UQPq/rDtDfh6mWRrQhEH9LUKqP8JLNZG/yjoxw3boKz4bNAsjyEMOwvFtpaIYf3GdKImLvWLPPc9MMrz0W121yWWlw36Gu22ZyivByqyf8Go4z3MYhsRwCeWPegxyaQAH8FXlzcYB5+pi/rlQKU4uQQwC8K9e+Nu5TLwFPYECFLLTTg3pzn0CL3T/oTumufnfdrDbyJRJ9s+4iV75iQ=
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: Futurewei.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 8a901b8d-c04c-40f3-9867-08d80c0d3c7e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jun 2020 00:37:06.0543 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 0fee8ff2-a3b2-4018-9c75-3a1d5591fedc
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 1X53+83Q6QegMMchCw/ddqp5cU+o0pL5cILoVZDJ4KsDkUohuFlj9P6arxfLLYVx4Dtw3Mkk8zOX8UFEnSrsQg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA0PR13MB4063
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/tupBnuHWSJIbhMvABELcid-RwB4>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-12
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 00:37:11 -0000
Peter, Thank you very much for adding the extra text to explain. But SR is supposed to be transparent to all intermediate nodes. Does your draft require a node to be specifically configured for each link to support or not support SR or RSVP-TE? In addition, there is no new attributes described in the document. So if a node is advertising TE related attributes for a specific link, such as bandwidth, delay, what kind problems this node will encounter if a remote node utilize those TE specific attributes? Linda Dunbar -----Original Message----- From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Sent: Monday, June 1, 2020 11:01 AM To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>; gen-art@ietf.org Cc: last-call@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.org Subject: Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-12 Hi Linda, On 01/06/2020 17:30, Linda Dunbar wrote: > Peter, > You said: > /“//the problem with existing advertisement is that RSVP-TE will use > it, even if it was not intended to be used by RSVP-TE.//”/ What is the > problem if RSVP-TE use the advertisement? What specific attributes > that RSVP-TE shouldn’t use? Following text has been added to the draft based on comments from Scott. "An example where this ambiguity causes problem is a network which has RSVP-TE enabled on one subset of links, and SRTE enabled on a different subset. A link attribute is advertised for the purpose of some other application (e.g. SRTE) for a link that is not enabled for RSV-TE. As soon as the router that is an RSVP-TE head-end sees the link attribute being advertised for such link, it assumes RSVP-TE is enabled on that link, even though in reality, RSVP-TE is not enabled on it. If such RSVP-TE head-end router tries to setup an RSVP-TE path via link where RSVP-TE is not enabled it will result in the path setup failure." Hope it makes it clear and addresses your question. thanks, Peter > Linda Dunbar > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> > Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 10:00 AM > To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>; gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: last-call@ietf.org; lsr@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Genart last call review of > draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-12 > Linda, > On 29/05/2020 16:52, Linda Dunbar wrote: >> Peter, >> You said: >> /we are not defining any new attributes./ /We are allowing an >> existing link attributes to be used by other applications, including, >> but not limited to SRTE./ What prevent a node (or an application on >> the node) receiving the LSA from using the attributes carried by the LSA? > the problem with existing advertisement is that RSVP-TE will use it, > even if it was not intended to be used by RSVP-TE. > We are providing a way to explicitly advertised apps that are allowed > to use the advertised attributes. >> If no new attributes are >> to be added, then why need a new ASLA sub-TLV? > to be able to use the existing attributes for new apps, other than RSVP-TE. > thanks, > Peter >> Linda >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com <mailto:ppsenak@cisco.com>> >> Sent: Friday, May 29, 2020 5:51 AM >> To: Linda Dunbar <linda.dunbar@futurewei.com >> <mailto:linda.dunbar@futurewei.com>>; > gen-art@ietf.org <mailto:gen-art@ietf.org> >> Cc: last-call@ietf.org <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>; lsr@ietf.org > <mailto:lsr@ietf.org>; >> draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.org > <mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.all@ietf.org> >> Subject: Re: Genart last call review of >> draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-12 >> Hi Linda, >> On 28/05/2020 19:02, Linda Dunbar via Datatracker wrote: >>> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar >>> Review result: Not Ready >>> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by >>> the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like >>> any other last call comments. >>> >>> For more information, please see the FAQ at >>> >>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftrac.ietf.org%2Ftrac%2Fgen%2Fwiki%2FGenArtfaq&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C1bd0e81d5279453d853808d8064500a2%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637266240741960001&sdata=faz4UopBwiK3D0CXWu%2BiebFOje9qfJt1wL6J4QqcjlY%3D&reserved=0>. >>> >>> Document: draft-ietf-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse-?? >>> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar >>> Review Date: 2020-05-28 >>> IETF LC End Date: 2020-05-29 >>> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat >>> >>> Summary: this document introduces a new link attribute advertisement >>> in OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 to address general link properties needed for >>> new applications, such as Segment Routing. >>> >>> Major issues: >>> The document has good description on the TLV structure of the >>> Application specific Advertisements, but fails to describe what are >>> the NEW Link attributes needed by Segment Routing. Page 7 (section >>> 5) has a really good description on all the link properties added to >>> OSFP (RFC4203, RFC 7308, RFC7471, RFC3630) to achieve TE. I can see >>> Segment Routing would need each node to advertise its own SID and >>> the SIDs of adjacent nodes. Can't they be encoded (or extended) in OSPF's NODE ID? >> we are not defining any new attributes. >> We are allowing an existing link attributes to be used by other >> applications, including, but not limited to SRTE. >> thanks, >> Peter >>> >>> Minor issues: >>> >>> Nits/editorial comments: >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Linda Dunbar >>> >>> >>> >>>
- [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf… Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Scott O. Bradner
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Peter Psenak
- Re: [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Last-Call] [Lsr] Genart last call review of … Peter Psenak
- Re: [Last-Call] [Lsr] Genart last call review of … Linda Dunbar