Re: [Last-Call] Bullying and "Fashionable"

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Wed, 05 October 2022 02:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D32C1524C5 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XbBZFb0GT83S for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd32.google.com (mail-io1-xd32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E07CFC1524B0 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 19:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd32.google.com with SMTP id y189so10099377iof.5 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 19:47:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=6ganjE8gAgtQdAR5PJayYQ21+MoyVY2WNlE9K3iW1pg=; b=LgEnNWiAEuBtkIXPrRrlllH++67sn4vINtaOG9WZ82AOx0s+5uGcVwJKON61gdmK+j dduBZvPrgH0op9A1+IOTRWlONKIs7bOnTfRPL91GPd7AlaX+A+Lc3YrMci/F1GVN44kd O4ipWQ9jAW04bua2zfvMLruUbhiaiSEoeglMw+OOoPJelNj9+4GRAuGpjcNyyVZMAncY K+iJPdQETIA2qQDG1a46KmMA7qetDAXWOo4JBOBiUVo0HAm3wSsh6T2jSXQjscJWQMLg BQEjPTapXbIi+4y0CifoX4/q+2Fdowm9FY/JKrLsp0lpwXIf0UetOKUOx0v3iJyNvmfP srEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=6ganjE8gAgtQdAR5PJayYQ21+MoyVY2WNlE9K3iW1pg=; b=InX0HLREX2GEdunD2+D2CKO+IhJ0SdZd9J3r+pLtXPDdWvj4iiLIE7cDRdXfOoXiCz KicAMSk1/qgSiMzv3QAWeylOuGa3tUWu/HcX/5V4JsB5spsEveE/X0SnPcCM8KaKaZyq ODDtjGJESMBAoMXNzGbvqF5yheq+jIxDXKpHH9YmrgxgpCE0ByROABAjz2rdRGNjcE8v LSnMIcf8cvbOU0xXNDVoB96DoSRv/VJWv5mHjk0xijCCEHvyDyQL7s1LnpS8CMbpkUft upU5n0aw6SMS9lI4pfh0Pqs2+Rgaz+5ckfjwWLWkuoMfzAEp+HRH+6nocuxvk4n1FIaR dLOQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf1zT9cGTcq89/k8ZyMbCVzz26dCq/Tb7XnVu1oeLf3VFhDtlikz DNm2YS/qkreZSuIZl3TLy0pOb6Wd/cXNCJj+29yUxg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM4wZiZSg7dobFOsaKg4vgiQOH8aKvAKjIGsu546NqRaeQYriMKkLoesQqK+MckUfdb8Eqa+0ogoor051UEtlNc=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:2a83:0:b0:6b4:3a75:7b38 with SMTP id q125-20020a6b2a83000000b006b43a757b38mr1714241ioq.96.1664938057847; Tue, 04 Oct 2022 19:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMm+LwjkCVf6NkGQSSXnnhh4N27FOHP86hrGetd3AZvei5h3PQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwjkCVf6NkGQSSXnnhh4N27FOHP86hrGetd3AZvei5h3PQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 19:47:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPFizd-zkD52=95=n-R2Scs3UhUfG0Ph+MRvjv1HO+h1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Cc: last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000082f1ef05ea40993b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/rNifgKtZiW37MPwcFPFsCMfLdHw>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Bullying and "Fashionable"
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:47:43 -0000

Can we not have this discussion on this forum, please, which is for Last
Calls.

-Ekr


On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 7:42 PM Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
wrote:

> As an aside here, the problem with bullying behavior is that it can lead
> to sloppiness and to argument by intimidation rather than getting things
> really right.
>
> Having done real politics fairly seriously at one point, I have a pretty
> thick hide. But many people don't and here is the problem, folk who
> experience intimidation often seem to learn that is the way to win
> arguments. And in the process, they end up shutting down arguments rather
> than trying to understand them.
>
> If someone wants to ridicule me because of my work of 20 years back, well,
> the fact people are still using it might make it worth while to ask why.
> And I can probably give a longer list of reasons why they suck than the
> critics and I can also explain why we took the approach we did because the
> alternatives also suck but in different ways.
>
> What really did give me pause for thought however was someone attacking me
> in a different forum for being 'out-dated', in particular holding
> unfashionable views against stream ciphers.
>
> What would happen in the security area if we allowed people to start
> winning arguments according to popularity? What if everyone suddenly
> decided that the fashionable thing was really great and anyone who
> criticized it was clearly stupid and ignorant?
>
> Why we might just end up with, oh I don't know, maybe a $2 trillion ponzi
> scheme about to collapse and take millions of people's savings with it
> because they were told that reinventing money...
>
> --
> last-call mailing list
> last-call@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call
>