IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Last-Call] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-11.txt

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net> Fri, 12 March 2021 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-Original-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: last-call@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D879C3A15E3 for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:49:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.121
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.121 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bbiw.net header.b=VIRl2NJ7; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=V5do8IWa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y_2PCIhzzRlw for <last-call@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:49:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADAEE3A15E4 for <last-call@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:49:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EAD5C00E6; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:49:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:49:16 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bbiw.net; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=1 tF86lqMWCWcnxXbPH2uGPAsAS3hUnc94r7FwhqP2BY=; b=VIRl2NJ7vtkoN49g+ e96rFQfgZ03dOZQr3z+8b/uWCDOj6UHg7NlNcA+G6icd/a7SxJey2RCqpvpjTSlW CWqvvDd4S9vQ/iHG25ma8VlQd3aAn6rMdEOClcCg5EIT3UUkoKEfrZTUhjQnOws5 iL4jggcuWA+Y9kkZmmCjORMqL5yC6kvcza5a6CLyY4oZPiC/7Ph8N5SSAm0j1kIe PkG53NhAWNL8LQVB+bNYRomE67qQch8cLmlS9rR4z0jPjt9ugxqhyaSli+B2MGZ5 oYSBbnT8VWEgJIBn5GfdW45LjFwZImJrMyvbi/pNJ299B0DNNLWRBLsfkt/LmeZU tme8g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=1tF86lqMWCWcnxXbPH2uGPAsAS3hUnc94r7FwhqP2 BY=; b=V5do8IWa4xIIvU+bR8uyvou6uiXvx4fatINBGococfrwPqUsUEYBcrEnn 4WhJkvi3JilNIzy9jw/5spzgKGPivZ+LuLJW9nA0OBirjBsQ1F3YkjCIga5ounnf Wev2TDxTLOdw7F3Kbm8n34pHZEpcHjZB2qfA4FmZxNOkqdk1CDYeHsetvPveq8gu YBMy54vY2HWBBYZEq/9dgGK5yN5mdIgQk3QmA/IUSjcvIBfhrAYXbfw1UU6Yi8gu MCos6EVDGwlMOH7Mw3qqw6apx2djKrp4yAHj1nB6fLu5H7nHvQUYwsIyBGMFZpQr vUvEBGGBZFuOLGHFjq9xfAYiBxTSQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:i7pKYMV0KBd8Llqul7T5t72y8EeKT6JXGGwZzvWN3gxu-ACXStWHNw> <xme:i7pKYAnStPjRvQEHEzcaezdBDmZ1MMTjPhTk6fZXzK27RzuCzD9wJXd4nypCstLyo 0iqSzkPJvz4rhr6_Q>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledruddvuddgvdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhfhokffffgggjggtgfesth ekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepffgrvhgvucevrhhotghkvghruceouggtrhhotghkvghr segssghifidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptddvfedugeehjefgvdffffelle egudfftedvueejkeeuveeiledufefhgfevhfejnecuffhomhgrihhnpegssghifidrnhgv thenucfkphepuddtkedrvddviedrudeivddrieefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepuggtrhhotghkvghrsegssghifidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:i7pKYAbcXb9hxjjNmJQ1CV6WrWEu5NzkgejVRTUfEcz7hxCS6KzmsQ> <xmx:i7pKYLV-Dx1QLh0ed-92Na8SejSN8HTdd0sPexcmfEYI4WVdlbnP7g> <xmx:i7pKYGlVj0zdKrewVJPL5IYpJPCAmhvGggCA8w3a2eHYpO_IiSjcYA> <xmx:jLpKYATd07_c8-cjNjtCHhhElE-ACusqbWS0Mca8xlX17z_IsR5xLw>
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 89FF31080063; Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:49:15 -0500 (EST)
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, last-call@ietf.org
References: <161522093129.10499.13819896737540561946@ietfa.amsl.com> <5d879b74-b5e9-a147-0c8e-2829bc77bd16@bbiw.net> <8779f860-00b0-ed3e-da21-9b3fb82b17e8@bbiw.net> <7d5c5404-8421-5946-8b49-2c6e030f8d2f@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <ca2b09e7-3d8b-0b66-6f81-de3c9903295a@bbiw.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 16:49:14 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <7d5c5404-8421-5946-8b49-2c6e030f8d2f@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/xPf9WnAtax0-BKNaiUAfwqIk69g>
Subject: Re: [Last-Call] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-crocker-inreply-react-11.txt
X-BeenThere: last-call@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Last Calls <last-call.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/last-call/>
List-Post: <mailto:last-call@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call>, <mailto:last-call-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 00:49:19 -0000

On 3/11/2021 4:45 PM, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> definitely 'unicode' should be capitalized. This is the only occasion 
> where 'unicode' appears in lower case except for an URI, where lower 
> case is what you want.

good catch (though the RFC Editor editors are pretty darn reliable, it 
can't hurt to lessen their load...) Next version is duly enhanced.


> (It would have been great if this draft used actual Unicode; it's 
> exactly the kind of draft for which all the work on allowing full 
> Unicode in RFCs was done.)

If it were essential, I suppose, but I remain an advocate for doing RFCs 
in net-ASCII, for maximum, ummmm... interoperability.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email