IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ldapext] Request for feedback: draft-wibrown-ldapssotoken

William Brown <wibrown@redhat.com> Sun, 04 September 2016 22:35 UTC

Return-Path: <wibrown@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91DD12B097 for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.41
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.41 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AwwVhxRqtIms for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E54F412B012 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 15:35:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A79485541 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 22:35:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rei.prd.blackhats.net.au (ovpn-116-25.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.25]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u84MZDSg020865 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Sep 2016 18:35:14 -0400
Message-ID: <1473028512.26123.43.camel@redhat.com>
From: William Brown <wibrown@redhat.com>
To: ldapext@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 08:35:12 +1000
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vjn5HOtiE3GgsWHwUElE"
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.22
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Sun, 04 Sep 2016 22:35:15 +0000 (UTC)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ldapext/joilzEekqk03M4-PZOnhe2xz9dg>
Subject: [ldapext] Request for feedback: draft-wibrown-ldapssotoken
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ldapext/>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2016 22:35:17 -0000

Hi,

I would like to ask for feedback on the submission
draft-wibrown-ldapssotoken [0]. Section 5 deals with the ldap components
of the implementation.

Thank you for your time and advice,

[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wibrown-ldapssotoken/

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email