IETF Logo Mail Archive

[ldapext] Re: Gen-Art Review: <draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr-01.txt>

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Fri, 08 July 2005 12:41 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA27668 for <ldapext-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 08:41:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dqsbc-0003kS-Sm for ldapext-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 09:09:27 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Dqs72-0002y5-MR; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 08:37:48 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DqnKi-00065U-PK for ldapext@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 03:31:36 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id DAA05872 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 03:31:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mtagate1.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.150]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dqnm2-0000N0-PX for ldapext@ietf.org; Fri, 08 Jul 2005 03:59:52 -0400
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate1.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j687VOFu154494 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 07:31:24 GMT
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j687VOF5124648 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:31:24 +0200
Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j687VOai005785 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:31:24 +0200
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j687VNbJ005772; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:31:23 +0200
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-145-253-251.de.ibm.com [9.145.253.251]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA71090; Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:31:17 +0200
Message-ID: <42CE2BBE.8070009@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 09:31:10 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: john.loughney@nokia.com
References: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CE872@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <1AA39B75171A7144A73216AED1D7478D6CE872@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 08:37:47 -0400
Cc: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>, Kurt@OpenLDAP.org, ldapext@ietf.org
Subject: [ldapext] Re: Gen-Art Review: <draft-zeilenga-ldap-incr-01.txt>
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ldapext>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ldapext-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ldapext-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

john.loughney@nokia.com wrote:
...
> 
> One line summary: This document is not ready for publication as a Informational
> publication.  More text on how to deal with race conditions need to be added.

John, as it happens, I queried Kurt about atomicity and was satisfied by his
response that LDAP intrinsically provides the required atomicity. That is kind
of basic in transaction processing, so I don't think it needs spelling out
in terms of race conditions.

    Brian


_______________________________________________
Ldapext mailing list
Ldapext@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email