IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [ldapext] Any implementations using userPassword;hash-scheme?

Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com> Sun, 27 January 2013 03:24 UTC

Return-Path: <lukeh@padl.com>
X-Original-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E3821F88FB for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:24:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OD01f+IUodCY for <ldapext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:24:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us.padl.com (us.padl.com [216.154.215.154]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1906F21F88B5 for <ldapext@ietf.org>; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 19:24:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by us.padl.com with ESMTP id r0R3O9GF001970; Sat, 26 Jan 2013 22:24:11 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Luke Howard <lukeh@padl.com>
In-Reply-To: <5103F924.2070800@stroeder.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 14:24:08 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <406C5DCE-CA6D-4E1C-BC00-2A89C9ACCF3B@padl.com>
References: <5103F924.2070800@stroeder.com>
To: ldapext <ldapext@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-SMTP-Vilter-Version: 1.3.6
X-Spamd-Symbols: AWL,BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST
X-SMTP-Vilter-Spam-Backend: spamd
X-Spam-Threshold: 5.0
X-Spam-Probability: -20.5
Cc: "ldap@umich.edu" <ldap@umich.edu>
Subject: Re: [ldapext] Any implementations using userPassword;hash-scheme?
X-BeenThere: ldapext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: LDAP Extension Working Group <ldapext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ldapext>
List-Post: <mailto:ldapext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext>, <mailto:ldapext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:24:15 -0000

I don't think you're going to find anything that uses this. nss_ldap supported authPassword as a compile-time option but, looking through the revision history, I can't find anything referring to attribute descriptions.

-- Luke

On 27/01/2013, at 2:41 AM, Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com> wrote:

> HI!
> 
> Is anyone here aware of any implementation using userPassword;hash-scheme?
> 
> It was described in RFC 2307 but starting with a rather vague text:
> "A future standard may specify LDAP v3 attribute descriptions to represent
> hashed userPasswords"
> 
> The text was already dropped in draft-howard-rfc2307bis-02 section 5.2.2.1.
> but without any further explanation.
> 
> So I guess there are no implementations but I want to make sure.
> 
> Ciao, Michael.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ldapext mailing list
> Ldapext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ldapext

--
Luke Howard / lukeh@padl.com
www.padl.com / www.lukehoward.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email