Re: [ledbat] initialization of current_delays in draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-08

Hi David,

thanks for your comments. I Incorporated them into the draft. 

The current_delays initiation thing is an artifact from the previous versions 
where a filter was used that chooses always the minimum. This was already on 
the ToDo list but we somehow missed it. We want to add a little more text 
regarding the filter anyway and we might just add a sentence that the 
infinity values could no be taken into account when applying the filter.
Thanks again.

Mirja

On Thursday 20 October 2011 11:10:51 David Ros wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After reading the current version of the draft, I was wondering (sorry if
> it's a very stupid question):
>
> Why does the current_delays list have to be initialized to +INFINITY? ("on
> initialization:", sec. 3.4.2) I understand why that's the case for
> base_delays, but not for current_delays.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David.
>
> PS: Jana and Mirja, I'll send you offline a list of typos I found.
>
>
> =================================================================
> David ROS
> http://www.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr/~dros/
>
> "But we're a university! [...] What sort of people would we be if we didn't
> go into the Library?" "Students." -- Terry Pratchett
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ledbat mailing list
> ledbat@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ledbat

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Dipl.-Ing. Mirja Kühlewind
Institute of Communication Networks and Computer Engineering (IKR)
University of Stuttgart, Germany
Pfaffenwaldring 47, D-70569 Stuttgart

tel: +49(0)711/685-67973
email: mirja.kuehlewind@ikr.uni-stuttgart.de
web: www.ikr.uni-stuttgart.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------